<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Wilson &#8211; Liar Or Idiot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/04/17/joe-wilson-liar-or-idiot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/04/17/joe-wilson-liar-or-idiot/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Jack</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/04/17/joe-wilson-liar-or-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/04/17/joe-wilson-liar-or-idiot/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Gaius said, &quot;Joe Wilson spoke - and the truth died.&quot;

The issue of Valerie Plame Wilson&#039;s alleged CIA covert status is another matter that the MSM shows little inclination to examine objectively, same for the Special Prosecutor, but maybe he already knows the answer too.

Such astonishing lack of curiosity notwithstanding, you&#039;ve got to hand it to those clever devils over at the CIA. Who would have ever thought you could get away with concealing a secret agent&#039;s identify by giving her a CIA desk job? Now, that&#039;s tradecraft. Are these guys good, or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaius said, &#8220;Joe Wilson spoke &#8211; and the truth died.&#8221;</p>
<p>The issue of Valerie Plame Wilson&#8217;s alleged CIA covert status is another matter that the MSM shows little inclination to examine objectively, same for the Special Prosecutor, but maybe he already knows the answer too.</p>
<p>Such astonishing lack of curiosity notwithstanding, you&#8217;ve got to hand it to those clever devils over at the CIA. Who would have ever thought you could get away with concealing a secret agent&#8217;s identify by giving her a CIA desk job? Now, that&#8217;s tradecraft. Are these guys good, or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

