Moral Leprosy

If there is a more loathsome politician in England that George Galloway, I can't even imagine who it is. Or how he could be worse. Not content with kissing up to Uday, son of Saddam Hussein, you know, the psychotic little puke with the rape rooms, he has gone on to bigger things. No, I'm not talking about his sleazier transvestite performance on Britain's Big Brother. Now he states in an interview that the murder by suicide bomber of Tony Blair would be justified.

The Respect MP George Galloway has said it would be morally justified for a suicide bomber to murder Tony Blair.

In an interview with GQ magazine, the reporter asked him: "Would the assassination of, say, Tony Blair by a suicide bomber - if there were no other casualties - be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq?"

Mr Galloway replied: "Yes, it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it - but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of 7/7. It would be entirely logical and explicable. And morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq - as Blair did."

Galloway is a slime ball with a severe case of moral leprosy. As more and more of his humanity falls away, the true soul of this foul creature emerges. Twisted and decayed, more and more is revealed with each public appearance or interview. He even gazes lovingly into the eyes of Fidel Castro and embraces. One presumes the kiss was French. 

Senate Passes Immigration Bill

The Senate today passed a new immigration reform bill. It remains to be seen what will happen in conference. One thing I will predict. If the Congress thinks they have done enough just to pass something, but fail to finish this, they will get a nasty surprise in November. Citizens want this solved. As in voters. If you fail to get an agreement in conference, expect some serious flak.

This Will Make You Sick

Quite a while back now, we reported on a New Zealand mountain climber who became the first double amputee to climb Mount Everest. Well, it seems there is a bit more to the story. Early into the final climb, Mark Inglis and the rest  of his team came across a stricken British climber who had run out of oxygen on the way down.

And they left him to die.

Remarkable story - but one that is incomplete.  Mr Inglis and his team of climbers came across a stricken lone climber at 8500m up the mountain who was headed down from the summit and had run out of oxygen and was dying.  Inglis and team were heading up - and kept on climbing, leaving David Sharp to die alone on the cold mountain.

Sure, they made a radio call to base and had a chat about what to do amongst themselves, decided Sharp was beyond saving and left him to continue their "amazing, stuff of dreams" ascent. 

I think that perhaps when Inglis lost his legs he also lost his humanity and conscience.  Apparently he may lose some fingers from the last climb, I suggest he has lost a lot more than digits, he's lost any right to respect.

Go over to the Daily Bayonet and read the rest. You'll be sick to your stomach though. Mark Inglis is no hero. He's not even fit for decent people to associate with.

An Inconvenient Graph

Perhaps someone could explain this?

Now the engineer in me questions the temperature measurements, since I really have no idea how you could be all that accurate over that length of time. But that CO2 curve looks to be objective and based off a sample. So a change of a couple hundred PPM of CO2 looks like it's a fairly regular occurrence. Was there a stone age equivalent of Halliburton, then?

H/T Mike's America for the link.

UPDATE: Major ouch moment here. Dr. Roy Spencer has a stinging set of questions for Al. At this point, Al's movie may actually have the opposite effect that he intended. It may actually bring the real debate into the open. Is man the primary cause of the recent warming or just a component? Or not even all that much of a player in forces much, much greater than what man's puny efforts can do? (Frankly, that graph above, from the UN itself, makes a lot of the "human based" arguments very problematic).

You Can Never Find A Trashcan When You Need One

Well, you sure can't in Kirk Sandalls, a village in Northern England. It seems the public trash cans keep disappearing. THere's a bit of disagreement over exactly how many have gone missing, but it's enough that residents are complaining about not being able to find one when they need one.

"In many cases the bins just disappear and we do not know where on earth they are," said Michael Edward, a 63-year-old retired teacher from the village near Doncaster.

Residents say at least 30 of the village's large metal bins have gone missing over the past year, although the council says the number is lower.

In an odd, yet completely unrelated coincidence our subsidiary, Gaius' Bargain Barn, is running a sale this week on large trash cans. Painted a lovely shade of government issue green, they are handy to put around in public places. We have about 30 on hand. Always low prices! Cash only.

How Not To Demonstrate Your Innocence

A man charged with murder didn't particularly like his lawyer's performance in court. After a series of rulings went against the man he decided it was time to do something about it.

So he tried to strangle the lawyer.

"I think he just didn't like the way some of the rulings the judge was making was going yesterday morning," attorney Bruce Carroll told WBZ Radio of the Tuesday morning attack by defendant John Gomes in Boston's Suffolk Superior Court.

It took an number of officers to pull the six foot, 250 pound defendant off the lawyer. The lawyer, incidentally, tried to get himself removed from the case last week. The judge refused to allow it.

While we here at Blue Crab Boulevard can certainly sympathize with Mr. Gomes, we simply can't condone leaving dead lawyers lying about. There's enough litter already.

ABC, Hastert And A Big Ol’ Gauntlet

A new letter from Dennis Hastert to ABC:

May 24, 2006

David Westin
George Stephanopoulos
Brian Ross
ABC News
7 West 66th St.
New York, NY 10023

RE: False Story Regarding Justice Department Investigation

Dear Mr. Westin, Mr. Stephanopoulos, and Mr. Ross:

            At 7:25 p.m., the Statement of the Department of Justice confirmed:

            “Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.”

            At 10:21 p.m., you wrote:

“Whether they like it or not, members of Congress, including Hastert, are under investigation,” one federal official said tonight.”

This statement is false, and your republication of it after actual knowledge of its falsity constitutes libel and defamation.  ABC News’ continued publication of this false information, after having actual knowledge of its falsity, evidences a specific and malicious intent to injure and damage Speaker Hastert’s reputation by continued repetition of a known falsehood.

We will take any and all actions necessary to rectify the harm ABC has caused and to hold those at ABC responsible for their conduct.

Please advise regarding who will accept service of process to remedy this intentional falsehood.

This is getting interesting, isn't it? Now, were they rolled or did they do it on purpose?

Demonstrations In Iran

Gateway Pundit has coverage on a series of violent protests that have been breaking out at universities all across Iran. It sounds like they are becoming more unruly almost daily.

* After fighting with police and vigilantes on Wednesday, Tehran University students set their dorms on fire Thursday as protests grew more violent overnight.

* Violence rocked the northern Tabriz region again on Wednesday as up to 16 were reported killed in the clashes including three students.

* Students at Ahwaz University in the southern Khuzistan Province also held protests on Wednesday against the regime.

Read the whole thing. As always, Jim has tons of links.

101st Blog Of The Day

Continuing on with my project, today I visit Hyscience. Now, really, don't hold back, Richard. Tell us how you really feel about Islamofascism!

Lay And Skilling Convicted

A jury found the two former Enron executives guilty of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud. Good and long overdue. I worked with a lot of people who got screwed by these two clowns and the sleazy company they ran.

The verdict put the blame for the 2001 demise of the high-profile energy trader, once the nation's seventh-largest company, squarely on its top two executives. It came in the sixth day of deliberations following a federal criminal trial that lasted nearly four months.

Lay was also convicted of bank fraud and making false statements to banks in a separate, non-jury trial before U.S. District Judge Sim Lake related to Lay's personal banking.

Couldn't happen to a nicer couple of guys. In the supreme irony, the judge picked an interesting day to pass sentence:

He (Judge Sim Lake) set sentencing for Sept. 11. The charges for which Lay was convicted carry a maximum penalty in prison of 45 years in the corporate trial and 120 years in the personal banking trial. The charges for which Skilling was convicted carry a maximum penalty of 185 years in prison.

A Sale Of Two Cities

One city is the shining city on the hill. The place where life expectancy has increased dramatically. The streets paved with increased wages and lower crime rates. A city with a booming economy, rising tax revenues and low inflation and interest rates.

The other is the city the Democrats talk about.

Ladies and Gentlemen! Blue Crab Boulevard proudly presents A Sale Of Two Cities! (With profound apologies to the spirit of Charles Dickens)>

Read more »

Palestinian President To Push Referendum

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has made a public pronouncement that either sets the stage for a resolution of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict or will ignite an outright civil war. He has set a deadline for Hamas to either approve conducting a referendum to set up a Palestinian state within ten days, or Abbas will go ahead with the referendum without Hamas. Experts expect the referendum would pass if it is held.

Abbas' surprise announcement was a political gamble that could either help resolve the Palestinians' internal deadlock or lead them into a deeper crisis with the militant Hamas group.

Such a vote would effectively ask Palestinians to give implicit recognition to Israel by accepting a Palestinian state on land occupied by Israel in 1967. Approval of the 18-point plan would provide a way out of the impasse over acceptance of Israel, which has led to an international freeze on aid to the Hamas-led government.

Hamas officials were divided over the idea of a referendum, with several giving their blessing, but others dismissing it as an attempt to undercut the Hamas-led government.

A referendum, which Palestinian pollsters expect to pass, could provide cover for the militants to moderate without appearing to succumb to Western pressure. Such a vote could also renew pressure on Israel to return to the negotiating table rather than imposing borders on the Palestinians.

It's a gutsy call, I think. If Hamas balks, it will probably spark the violence level much higher and cause a true civil war. If Hamas cooperates, they are likely to be seriously weakened politically.

FBI Beefs Up Staff

Specifically, the staff that looks at campaign finance and other election related crimes!

Federal law-enforcement officials say they witnessed a dramatic jump in campaign-finance and other election-related crimes in the 2004 presidential election year and are determined to beef up their policing of candidates running for federal and local office around the country this year.

Illegal fundraising schemes appear to have grown in number and sophistication as candidates have needed to raise more and more money to be competitive. Several members of Congress have recently found themselves caught up in fundraising controversies.

In the past year and a half, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has reassigned nearly 200 agents to the problem of public corruption, bringing to 600 the total number of agents working on public-integrity cases.

Whoops. Methinks that bipartisan culture of corruption better be watching their backs!

Chip Burrus, assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division, who is in charge of all public-corruption investigations, explained the new emphasis on election crimes in an interview Monday.

“We kept getting a lot of reports from the field regarding different schemes that were coming up that involved election issues,” he said. “These schemes are getting a lot more complicated than they ever have been before.”

Burrus said that the bureau had previously designated “two or three agents” 30 days before Election Day to respond to allegations of voter fraud. Often, these agents couldn’t do much before the election for fear of being accused of interfering in the election.

“We always seemed to be chasing the problem instead of getting ahead of it,” he said. “Now we have agents looking for this stuff every day,” instead of waiting until late September or October.

Well, this is actually very good news, I think. It would be nice to get the Hill cleaned up, for everyone's sake. I think that just knowing that the FBI is more active will begin to curb the worst of the corruption pretty fast. A few high-profile perp-walks tend to focus the minds of some of the less ethical.

Wow, This Just Keeps Getting Better

I honestly think the Congress is completely out of touch with reality at this point. Like the decadent royal courts of Royal France and Imperial Russia, they no longer hear what the people say, or understand how they look to those people. The courtiers jockeying for position and power have no time to actually deal with any real problems. They dress well and expect their privileges, though. Oh yes, the privileges are very, very important.

Nancy Pelosi, who I frankly think is not a very sharp politician, called for Jefferson to step down from his committee seat. Jefferson refused. Now it turns out that there was an enormous political upheaval within the ranks of the Congressional Black Caucus over Pelosi's move.

Furious black lawmakers, rallying behind Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), were pulled back from the brink of open revolt against House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in an emergency meeting with her yesterday.

The meeting with a handful of CBC members was called after Pelosi wrote the embattled lawmaker, who is at the center of a massive bribery scandal, a curt note requesting his immediate resignation from the powerful Ways and Means Committee.

Outraged that one of its members was being picked on even though he has not been charged with a crime, the Congressional Black Caucus had intended to issue a defiant statement against their leader but agreed after the meeting to pause, at least briefly, for reflection.

Earlier this week, Pelosi approached Jefferson and told him that she thought he should resign, according to a Democratic aide. Later, at the Democratic caucus meeting yesterday morning, she took him into a side room and told him that she had prepared a letter calling on him to resign the committee seat and that she would allow him one hour to withdraw gracefully before she sent it, according to the aide. In both instances, Jefferson remained defiant.

Pelosi’s one-sentence missive to Jefferson called on him to vacate his committee seat “in the interest of upholding the high ethical standard of the House Democratic Caucus.”

Jefferson promptly refused, calling her request “discriminatory” and “unprecedented,” and suggested that she was employing a double standard by failing to ask other lawmakers facing ethics questions to relinquish their committee assignments. Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) has come under fire for earmarks he secured through his seat on the Appropriations Committee.

Yes, by all means leap to the defense of a man who keeps cold, hard cash on hand at all times. In his freezer. A man who has his own video out showing him taking cash. Good move. Plays well in Peoria, too. I've said before that the Democrats blew it on this one, this just seals the deal, I think. The issue is not, and should never be the color of a man's skin. It should be about his actions. But there was an ominous warning yesterday:

Most lawmakers would not comment afterwards, but a CBC aide summed up some members’ frustration, saying, “Congresswoman Pelosi, by preemption without any legal justification, has now created a new precedent for how members are going to be treated. Unfortunately, she’s chosen to single out an African-American for this honor.”

Then the aide added an electoral threat, saying, “The African-American community, which overwhelmingly backs the Democratic Party, will not take this lightly. I hope she enjoys being minority leader.”

And this bit of farce as well:

Meanwhile, Pelosi and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) called in a joint statement for the Justice Department to return the records taken in the search of Jefferson’s office.

More and more like the royal courts each day. Slipping into decadence, disregarding the people. One big difference, though. The old royal courts had courtiers. We appear to have an entire Congress made up of only court jesters.

Wrong Track

If there was ever a good indicator of how wrong Bush's stance on immigration is, this is it. Jimmy Carter approves of it. That right there should be enough to take away an awful lot of support.

Anyone who has been reading this blog for any length of time knows my opinion of Carter.

WordPress Themes