http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/ Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/comment-page-1/#comment-17827 Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » General Court Martial For Watada Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:57:46 +0000 http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/#comment-17827 [...] It is, of course, up to the chain of command what happens from here. But an article 32 is similar to a grand jury proceeding in the civilian world. Earlier posts here, here and here. [...] [...] It is, of course, up to the chain of command what happens from here. But an article 32 is similar to a grand jury proceeding in the civilian world. Earlier posts here, here and here. [...]

]]> http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/comment-page-1/#comment-17630 Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » Dishonorable Support For A Dishonorable Act Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:22:02 +0000 http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/#comment-17630 [...] It really is no surprise that the ACLU has decided to attempt to insert itself into legal proceedings against lieutenant (soon-to-be private) Ehren Watada. (I've written about the dishonorable soldier before here and here.) For those who don't know the history of this, Watada refused orders to deploy to Iraq with his unit, then got a bunch of "peace activists" to try to help get him off. (Do I sound contemptuous of Watada? Good.) TACOMA, WA — In a military justice case that has drawn wide attention, the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington is backing the free speech rights of a soldier facing court martial for refusing to serve in the war in Iraq. The ACLU today submitted a friend-of-the-court brief contending that Lt. Ehren Watada should not be punished for his public statements expressing legal and moral objections to the war in Iraq. [...] [...] It really is no surprise that the ACLU has decided to attempt to insert itself into legal proceedings against lieutenant (soon-to-be private) Ehren Watada. (I've written about the dishonorable soldier before here and here.) For those who don't know the history of this, Watada refused orders to deploy to Iraq with his unit, then got a bunch of "peace activists" to try to help get him off. (Do I sound contemptuous of Watada? Good.) TACOMA, WA — In a military justice case that has drawn wide attention, the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington is backing the free speech rights of a soldier facing court martial for refusing to serve in the war in Iraq. The ACLU today submitted a friend-of-the-court brief contending that Lt. Ehren Watada should not be punished for his public statements expressing legal and moral objections to the war in Iraq. [...]

]]> http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/comment-page-1/#comment-9260 Gaius Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:31:02 +0000 http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/#comment-9260 It helps stabilize output. It will only help for a limited time (until the water runs out) and they can only do it at all because demand drops enough at night that they have a surplus of electricity available. It helps stabilize output. It will only help for a limited time (until the water runs out) and they can only do it at all because demand drops enough at night that they have a surplus of electricity available.

]]> http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/comment-page-1/#comment-9259 Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » Dishonor Update Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:29:24 +0000 http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/07/dishonor/#comment-9259 [...] The Army has brought formal charges against lieutenant Ehren Watada, the dishonorable, and dishonored,  soldier who refused orders to deploy with his unit to Iraq. The charges are missing movement, contempt toward officials and conduct unbecoming an officer. The missing movement charge carries a possible two year jail sentence. (My original post is here). "Officers are held to a high moral and legal standard. Acts contrary to this standard may be tried by court-martial," said the Army statement. [...] [...] The Army has brought formal charges against lieutenant Ehren Watada, the dishonorable, and dishonored,  soldier who refused orders to deploy with his unit to Iraq. The charges are missing movement, contempt toward officials and conduct unbecoming an officer. The missing movement charge carries a possible two year jail sentence. (My original post is here). "Officers are held to a high moral and legal standard. Acts contrary to this standard may be tried by court-martial," said the Army statement. [...]

]]>