<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Lord</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Am Waiting For The Denunciations</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7222</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Am Waiting For The Denunciations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/#comment-7222</guid>
		<description>[...] The people advocating this are two former Clinton administration officials and now Walter Mondale. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The people advocating this are two former Clinton administration officials and now Walter Mondale. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Jack</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/#comment-7141</guid>
		<description>No, don&#039;t go overt, deploy the double super secret two fisted Callinectes sapidus subsea scavenger hoard. You can count on Jimmy to go after that North Korean rocket tooth and claw, and look good doing it, by jingo.

BTW, does anyone else think new bushel baskets are pretty? Just askin&#039;. I&#039;ve begun to have some &quot;concerns&quot; about a few of my peculiar &quot;tastes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, don&#8217;t go overt, deploy the double super secret two fisted Callinectes sapidus subsea scavenger hoard. You can count on Jimmy to go after that North Korean rocket tooth and claw, and look good doing it, by jingo.</p>
<p>BTW, does anyone else think new bushel baskets are pretty? Just askin&#8217;. I&#8217;ve begun to have some &#8220;concerns&#8221; about a few of my peculiar &#8220;tastes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackhawk</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7045</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/#comment-7045</guid>
		<description>Agree. If we do shoot it down, do it over international waters where we can collect the pieces and analyze them.

Maybe, if it will get the appropriate response, launch one of our own into the Yellow Sea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. If we do shoot it down, do it over international waters where we can collect the pieces and analyze them.</p>
<p>Maybe, if it will get the appropriate response, launch one of our own into the Yellow Sea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninth State &#187; To Strike Or Not To Strike?</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninth State &#187; To Strike Or Not To Strike?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/#comment-6991</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the issues at hand is whether or not North Korea is planning to use this missile in order to launch a sattelite. They could ease the tension even further by, you know, telling the rest of the world that this is the case instead of having us all guess. Who knows what&#8217;s going on in the mind of Kim Jong Il?  Gauis at Blue Crab Boulevard points out a piece from today&#8217;s Washington Post where two former Clinton administration officials, Ashton B. Carter and William J. Perry, advocate preemptive destruction of North Korea&#8217;s missile: Should the United States allow a country openly hostile to it and armed with nuclear weapons to perfect an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering nuclear weapons to U.S. soil? We believe not. The Bush administration has unwisely ballyhooed the doctrine of &#8220;preemption,&#8221; which all previous presidents have sustained as an option rather than a dogma. It has applied the doctrine to Iraq, where the intelligence pointed to a threat from weapons of mass destruction that was much smaller than the risk North Korea poses. (The actual threat from Saddam Hussein was, we now know, even smaller than believed at the time of the invasion.) But intervening before mortal threats to U.S. security can develop is surely a prudent policy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the issues at hand is whether or not North Korea is planning to use this missile in order to launch a sattelite. They could ease the tension even further by, you know, telling the rest of the world that this is the case instead of having us all guess. Who knows what&#8217;s going on in the mind of Kim Jong Il?  Gauis at Blue Crab Boulevard points out a piece from today&#8217;s Washington Post where two former Clinton administration officials, Ashton B. Carter and William J. Perry, advocate preemptive destruction of North Korea&#8217;s missile: Should the United States allow a country openly hostile to it and armed with nuclear weapons to perfect an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering nuclear weapons to U.S. soil? We believe not. The Bush administration has unwisely ballyhooed the doctrine of &#8220;preemption,&#8221; which all previous presidents have sustained as an option rather than a dogma. It has applied the doctrine to Iraq, where the intelligence pointed to a threat from weapons of mass destruction that was much smaller than the risk North Korea poses. (The actual threat from Saddam Hussein was, we now know, even smaller than believed at the time of the invasion.) But intervening before mortal threats to U.S. security can develop is surely a prudent policy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6950</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/22/good-lord-2/#comment-6950</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If Necessary, Strike and Destroy...&lt;/strong&gt;

You did not like us doing it in Iraq, which was in violation of 18 UN ammendments, and which was shooting at our warplanes almost daily, and yet you want us to commit an act of war on North Korea, and just blow up one missle, when if we do anything, .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If Necessary, Strike and Destroy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You did not like us doing it in Iraq, which was in violation of 18 UN ammendments, and which was shooting at our warplanes almost daily, and yet you want us to commit an act of war on North Korea, and just blow up one missle, when if we do anything, &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

