<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8041</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-8041</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure they aren&#039;t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure they aren&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbaB</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8040</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbaB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-8040</guid>
		<description>Sigh!!  Rush Limbaugh is not and never has been a &quot;born-again Christian.&quot;  Just because he is conservative doesn&#039;t mean he is religious.  Rush is very pro-religion, but when pressed, he will admit that he has never accepted Christ.

I knew a very conservative atheist who got very upset at how the liberals were trying to remove &quot;under God&quot; from everything.  His opinion:  If ya don&#039;t believe in God, why make a fuss over Him?

By the way, excellent smear tactics from the hit-and-run trolls.  Maybe the NYT should be reading your blog, Gaius!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh!!  Rush Limbaugh is not and never has been a &#8220;born-again Christian.&#8221;  Just because he is conservative doesn&#8217;t mean he is religious.  Rush is very pro-religion, but when pressed, he will admit that he has never accepted Christ.</p>
<p>I knew a very conservative atheist who got very upset at how the liberals were trying to remove &#8220;under God&#8221; from everything.  His opinion:  If ya don&#8217;t believe in God, why make a fuss over Him?</p>
<p>By the way, excellent smear tactics from the hit-and-run trolls.  Maybe the NYT should be reading your blog, Gaius!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salmonella5000</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7927</link>
		<dc:creator>salmonella5000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7927</guid>
		<description>Some Square in a Shack whined about how he hadn&#039;t seen The Left &quot;dogpiling&quot; on Patrick Kennedy &quot;like this.&quot;  Dude, Kennedy didn&#039;t have a million Oxycontin pills falling out of his pajamas while he was trying to buy a million more Oxycontin pills, doesn&#039;t have a radio show that broadcasts his pharmaceutical-induced rants  over Armed Forces Radio, and you aren&#039;t as attracted to Kennedy as you are to your jovial little quipster, Rush Limbaugh.

Rule Number one: A drug addict is a self-destructive liar.  He&#039;ll lie when it&#039;s in his best interests to tell the truth.  Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.  He will do illegal things even when it&#039;s in his best interests to do the legal things. 

You are all trying to cover this Viagra thing up by telling yourselves it&#039;s &quot;minor-league, second-degree misdemeanor stuff.&quot;  Guys.  It&#039;s illegal.  You sound just like the mother of the serial killer who&#039;s been caught red-handed, found guilty and sits on Death Row, but good old mom swears up and down what a nice boy her son is and how he wouldn&#039;t hurt a fly!

That&#039;s the truth.

It&#039;s practically guaranteed that a drug addict will relapse at least once.  More often than not, they go back to using and eventually die.  All of you who make light of Limbaugh&#039;s disease are refusing to see how deeply disturbed Rush Limbaugh must certainly be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some Square in a Shack whined about how he hadn&#8217;t seen The Left &#8220;dogpiling&#8221; on Patrick Kennedy &#8220;like this.&#8221;  Dude, Kennedy didn&#8217;t have a million Oxycontin pills falling out of his pajamas while he was trying to buy a million more Oxycontin pills, doesn&#8217;t have a radio show that broadcasts his pharmaceutical-induced rants  over Armed Forces Radio, and you aren&#8217;t as attracted to Kennedy as you are to your jovial little quipster, Rush Limbaugh.</p>
<p>Rule Number one: A drug addict is a self-destructive liar.  He&#8217;ll lie when it&#8217;s in his best interests to tell the truth.  Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict.  He will do illegal things even when it&#8217;s in his best interests to do the legal things. </p>
<p>You are all trying to cover this Viagra thing up by telling yourselves it&#8217;s &#8220;minor-league, second-degree misdemeanor stuff.&#8221;  Guys.  It&#8217;s illegal.  You sound just like the mother of the serial killer who&#8217;s been caught red-handed, found guilty and sits on Death Row, but good old mom swears up and down what a nice boy her son is and how he wouldn&#8217;t hurt a fly!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the truth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s practically guaranteed that a drug addict will relapse at least once.  More often than not, they go back to using and eventually die.  All of you who make light of Limbaugh&#8217;s disease are refusing to see how deeply disturbed Rush Limbaugh must certainly be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7832</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7832</guid>
		<description>[...] Except perhaps for a few arched questions from, Blue Crab Boulevard.  You know what? I didn&#8217;t see the left dogpiling on Patrick Kennedy like this. The more right people who commented on Kennedy (that I read, anyway) were more upset at his apparent favorable treatment than gloating over his problem. Not so the left. Isn&#8217;t that interesting? Isn&#8217;t that revealing? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Except perhaps for a few arched questions from, Blue Crab Boulevard.  You know what? I didn&#8217;t see the left dogpiling on Patrick Kennedy like this. The more right people who commented on Kennedy (that I read, anyway) were more upset at his apparent favorable treatment than gloating over his problem. Not so the left. Isn&#8217;t that interesting? Isn&#8217;t that revealing? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>Tom, just as a note, Limbaugh wasn&#039;t actually prosecuted for &quot;doctor shopping&quot; insofar as the prosecution barely had enough evidence to get an indictment, much less take it to court. That&#039;s why they spend so long dredging up his medical records, then releasing them to the press. His case never went to court and the plea was basically a graceful way out for them and a way for Limbaugh to end the issue. They&#039;ve both pretty much validated that.

As far as this goes, there&#039;s far too little information to actually pass judgment at all not that it&#039;ll stop the flood of lefty bloggers from doing so anyhow. Frist, Limbaugh wasn&#039;t in possession of Viagra without a prescription. He was in possession of a bottle of Viagra that didn&#039;t have his name on it. That&#039;s a second-degree misdemeanor - minor-league stuff that rarely sees the light of day on the local paper&#039;s police blotter. Second, it would not surprise me to know that, in order to protect the privacy of their patients, doctors do not issue prescriptions in the names of their high-visibility clients, to prevent snoopers from getting that information and blaring it all over the tabloids. Were I a physician, I&#039;d sure as hell do it.

It&#039;s not much of a shock to see folks who would normally scream themselves into a coma of privacy rights gleefully pushing this story to anyone who&#039;ll listen. After all, it&#039;s Rush Limbaugh and, as we all know, he doesn&#039;t deserve the same rights as those who think correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, just as a note, Limbaugh wasn&#8217;t actually prosecuted for &#8220;doctor shopping&#8221; insofar as the prosecution barely had enough evidence to get an indictment, much less take it to court. That&#8217;s why they spend so long dredging up his medical records, then releasing them to the press. His case never went to court and the plea was basically a graceful way out for them and a way for Limbaugh to end the issue. They&#8217;ve both pretty much validated that.</p>
<p>As far as this goes, there&#8217;s far too little information to actually pass judgment at all not that it&#8217;ll stop the flood of lefty bloggers from doing so anyhow. Frist, Limbaugh wasn&#8217;t in possession of Viagra without a prescription. He was in possession of a bottle of Viagra that didn&#8217;t have his name on it. That&#8217;s a second-degree misdemeanor &#8211; minor-league stuff that rarely sees the light of day on the local paper&#8217;s police blotter. Second, it would not surprise me to know that, in order to protect the privacy of their patients, doctors do not issue prescriptions in the names of their high-visibility clients, to prevent snoopers from getting that information and blaring it all over the tabloids. Were I a physician, I&#8217;d sure as hell do it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not much of a shock to see folks who would normally scream themselves into a coma of privacy rights gleefully pushing this story to anyone who&#8217;ll listen. After all, it&#8217;s Rush Limbaugh and, as we all know, he doesn&#8217;t deserve the same rights as those who think correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7810</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7810</guid>
		<description>Not sensitive to other views, annoyed with smears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sensitive to other views, annoyed with smears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol l. vassallo</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7809</link>
		<dc:creator>carol l. vassallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7809</guid>
		<description>Gaius:
   Looks like you&#039;re a little sensitive to alternative viewpoints.  Then why have a blog?
Clv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaius:<br />
   Looks like you&#8217;re a little sensitive to alternative viewpoints.  Then why have a blog?<br />
Clv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7801</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7801</guid>
		<description>Then why come here if you don&#039;t like my blog? Other than a chance to exactly prove the point I made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why come here if you don&#8217;t like my blog? Other than a chance to exactly prove the point I made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7800</guid>
		<description>Just trying to keep up to your standards, Gaius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just trying to keep up to your standards, Gaius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>Nice completely unsubstantiated smear, Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice completely unsubstantiated smear, Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7797</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7797</guid>
		<description>So why was Rush visiting the child prostitution capital of the Western Hemisphere with an unlabeled bottle of viagra? Was he with his wife? Oh that&#039;s right, he&#039;s not married. Since he&#039;s a righteous born-again Christian, I&#039;m sure he has a good explanation. Right?...Hello?...Is that the sound of crickets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why was Rush visiting the child prostitution capital of the Western Hemisphere with an unlabeled bottle of viagra? Was he with his wife? Oh that&#8217;s right, he&#8217;s not married. Since he&#8217;s a righteous born-again Christian, I&#8217;m sure he has a good explanation. Right?&#8230;Hello?&#8230;Is that the sound of crickets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7793</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7793</guid>
		<description>You are making assumptions. You do not know the terms of his probation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making assumptions. You do not know the terms of his probation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7792</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7792</guid>
		<description>He certainly is receiving favorable treatment.  Let&#039;s not forget this guy is on probation.  What is a guy on probation doing in the Dominican Republic anyway?  Probationers are not routinely given permission to leave the country.  If he didn&#039;t have the written consent of his probation officer it is a violation of probation.

Possessing prescription drugs without a prescription is a clear violation, even if it is only something to help the old blowhard get it up.  Rush Limbaugh flouts the law and receives favorable treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He certainly is receiving favorable treatment.  Let&#8217;s not forget this guy is on probation.  What is a guy on probation doing in the Dominican Republic anyway?  Probationers are not routinely given permission to leave the country.  If he didn&#8217;t have the written consent of his probation officer it is a violation of probation.</p>
<p>Possessing prescription drugs without a prescription is a clear violation, even if it is only something to help the old blowhard get it up.  Rush Limbaugh flouts the law and receives favorable treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Texas</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7767</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7767</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a link to a gloater would buttress your case.  As it is, most commenters I&#039;ve read simply said that it was unbelievably stupid of Limbaugh to violate his probation and that it&#039;s quite possibly illegal for a doctor to write a prescription to themselves rather than their patient (not to mention that doctor shopping is precisely what Limbaugh was prosecuted for the first time).  Doesn&#039;t seem like gloating to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a link to a gloater would buttress your case.  As it is, most commenters I&#8217;ve read simply said that it was unbelievably stupid of Limbaugh to violate his probation and that it&#8217;s quite possibly illegal for a doctor to write a prescription to themselves rather than their patient (not to mention that doctor shopping is precisely what Limbaugh was prosecuted for the first time).  Doesn&#8217;t seem like gloating to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Heretik &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Blue Eyes</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7756</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heretik &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Blue Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/26/yuck-2/#comment-7756</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t Cry for Me, Blue Ball Crab Boulevard: What about Patrick Kennedy, huh? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t Cry for Me, Blue Ball Crab Boulevard: What about Patrick Kennedy, huh? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

