<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recycling Stories In Hopes Of Gaining Traction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/27/recycling-stories-in-hopes-of-gaining-traction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/27/recycling-stories-in-hopes-of-gaining-traction/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/27/recycling-stories-in-hopes-of-gaining-traction/comment-page-1/#comment-7803</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/06/27/recycling-stories-in-hopes-of-gaining-traction/#comment-7803</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quiet Swap: NY Times Changed Late Edition of Swift Bank Story to Appear More Objective...&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times printed two versions of the Swift Bank Data strory under two different headlines. They have very slight differences but I am suspicious of their intentions if for nothing else than because they changed the Headline to do it. Why not ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quiet Swap: NY Times Changed Late Edition of Swift Bank Story to Appear More Objective&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times printed two versions of the Swift Bank Data strory under two different headlines. They have very slight differences but I am suspicious of their intentions if for nothing else than because they changed the Headline to do it. Why not &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

