<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman &#8211; Lamont Debate And The WaPo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Jack</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9353</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9353</guid>
		<description>I watched the debate. Lieberman came off as the adult, but Lamont had more energy and was quicker and more direct in his attacks. Also, Lieberman seemed old and his face was a bit puffy, while Lamont gets points for health and vigor.

There was plenty of opportunity for partisans to see whatever they expected or hoped for. Although the decision goes to Lieberman he didn&#039;t come close to giving Lamont a good shellacking, so Lamont can claim a moral victory, but only because Lieberman didn&#039;t kick him around hard enough. Lieberman was going easy on Lamont.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the debate. Lieberman came off as the adult, but Lamont had more energy and was quicker and more direct in his attacks. Also, Lieberman seemed old and his face was a bit puffy, while Lamont gets points for health and vigor.</p>
<p>There was plenty of opportunity for partisans to see whatever they expected or hoped for. Although the decision goes to Lieberman he didn&#8217;t come close to giving Lamont a good shellacking, so Lamont can claim a moral victory, but only because Lieberman didn&#8217;t kick him around hard enough. Lieberman was going easy on Lamont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9315</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9315</guid>
		<description>They already are. Mind you they sound exactly like children: &quot;Look what HE did!&quot;

If by &quot;Republican&quot; they mean &quot;effective&quot; they are correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already are. Mind you they sound exactly like children: &#8220;Look what HE did!&#8221;</p>
<p>If by &#8220;Republican&#8221; they mean &#8220;effective&#8221; they are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9314</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9314</guid>
		<description>Gaius, the story did seem neutral. Is the reporter new? Did he/she flunk out of journalism school? Doesn&#039;t he/she understand American journalism? I believe the most damning thing for Lamont is that Lieberman stated that Lamont had donated to his campaign three times, even AFTER Lieberman&#039;s position on the war had been established!

BTW, the Kossacks will use the Reaganesque quote against him (&quot;See, he&#039;s acting like a Republican!&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaius, the story did seem neutral. Is the reporter new? Did he/she flunk out of journalism school? Doesn&#8217;t he/she understand American journalism? I believe the most damning thing for Lamont is that Lieberman stated that Lamont had donated to his campaign three times, even AFTER Lieberman&#8217;s position on the war had been established!</p>
<p>BTW, the Kossacks will use the Reaganesque quote against him (&#8220;See, he&#8217;s acting like a Republican!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC@LeatherPenguin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9281</link>
		<dc:creator>TC@LeatherPenguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9281</guid>
		<description>I called a friend in Insurancetown (Stanford) for his reaction, and he said &quot;Really? They were on TV?&quot;

Me: &quot;you were watching the Yankee game, weren&#039;t you?&quot;
Him: &quot;Like you weren&#039;t?&quot;
Me: &quot;At least I was switching in between pitches.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called a friend in Insurancetown (Stanford) for his reaction, and he said &#8220;Really? They were on TV?&#8221;</p>
<p>Me: &#8220;you were watching the Yankee game, weren&#8217;t you?&#8221;<br />
Him: &#8220;Like you weren&#8217;t?&#8221;<br />
Me: &#8220;At least I was switching in between pitches.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9279</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9279</guid>
		<description>The nutroots are proclaiming a mega victory.

That&#039;ll work.

Not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nutroots are proclaiming a mega victory.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll work.</p>
<p>Not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC@LeatherPenguin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/comment-page-1/#comment-9277</link>
		<dc:creator>TC@LeatherPenguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/06/lieberman-lamont-debate-and-the-wapo/#comment-9277</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about &quot;beat the heck out of Lamont,&quot; but he sure as hell showed Mr. Mentos was not even close to &#039;Ready For Prime Time.&#039;

And combining a bit of Bentson&#039;s &quot;I knew Jack Kennedy&quot; and &quot;There you ago again&quot; a la Reagan certainly showed who was the adult involved in this typical dog and pony show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about &#8220;beat the heck out of Lamont,&#8221; but he sure as hell showed Mr. Mentos was not even close to &#8216;Ready For Prime Time.&#8217;</p>
<p>And combining a bit of Bentson&#8217;s &#8220;I knew Jack Kennedy&#8221; and &#8220;There you ago again&#8221; a la Reagan certainly showed who was the adult involved in this typical dog and pony show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

