<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jacoby On Chickenhawks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-13190</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/#comment-13190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jeff Jacoby on the &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221; argument...&lt;/strong&gt;

I wrote about the &#8220;you&#8217;re a chickenhawk so you can&#8217;t comment&#8221; argument back in August of last year, but am revisiting it again thanks to a great opinion piece on the subject written by Jeff Jacoby in today&#8217;s Boston Globe. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeff Jacoby on the &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221; argument&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I wrote about the &#8220;you&#8217;re a chickenhawk so you can&#8217;t comment&#8221; argument back in August of last year, but am revisiting it again thanks to a great opinion piece on the subject written by Jeff Jacoby in today&#8217;s Boston Globe. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juaquin Salgado</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-13146</link>
		<dc:creator>Juaquin Salgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/#comment-13146</guid>
		<description>I would gladly play chicken to their hawk, but their brand of hawk won&#039;t hunt...and that sounds a little chicken to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would gladly play chicken to their hawk, but their brand of hawk won&#8217;t hunt&#8230;and that sounds a little chicken to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-13137</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/07/24/jacoby-on-chickenhawks/#comment-13137</guid>
		<description>Yes, this notion that only people who served can be hawks but anyone may be a dove is silly.  It is designed to intimidate people who didn&#039;t serve but support the policy from speaking their opinion making the other opinion appear more popular than it really is.  Basically the purpose is to stifle one side of the argument.  Psyops 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this notion that only people who served can be hawks but anyone may be a dove is silly.  It is designed to intimidate people who didn&#8217;t serve but support the policy from speaking their opinion making the other opinion appear more popular than it really is.  Basically the purpose is to stifle one side of the argument.  Psyops 101.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

