Condi’s War
That what Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post has dubbed the situation in Lebanon. A twisted view of the world that is hard to fathom. But Robinson is plucky and pours his views out in a veritable technicolor yawn of leftism.
It was Rice who waited more than a week, giving Israel time to pound the daylights out of Lebanon, before finding time to visit Beirut and Tel Aviv and attend a crisis summit in Rome. It was Rice who spent her trip categorically ruling out a quick cease-fire, which made one wonder if she really needed to travel at all, since she could have just thumbed out a text message: "2 soon 2 stop boom boom."
The most significant development from Rice's swing through the region was that she took personal ownership of the bloody, escalating war between Israeli troops and Hezbollah guerrillas with a single breathtaking pronouncement:
"It is time for a new Middle East. It is time to say to those who do not want a different kind of Middle East that we will prevail, they will not."
Take a moment to absorb those two sentences. The bit about how "we will prevail" is just standard chest-thumping from the Bush administration, the equivalent of George W. Bush's "bring it on" challenge to the Iraqi insurgents. It's the "new Middle East" part, which she repeated at every opportunity, that makes this Condi's war and that should send shivers down the spine of anyone who has more than a passing knowledge of the region.
What secretary of state hasn't dreamed of a new Middle East where peaceful, democratic nations live in harmony? They all have, I suspect, but any utopian fantasies they might have entertained inevitably ran smack into dystopian realities. The current-model Middle East is replete with legitimate grievances, non-negotiable demands, ancient resentments, Machiavellian alliances, religious fanaticism and modern weapons of war. The idea of a grand stroke that would somehow create a "new" model is not just unrealistic, it's downright frightening.
His condescension is absolutely limitless. Take a moment to absorb his words (to steal a phrase). You see, he understands the world and the Middle East better than the Secretary of State and the elected govenment of the country. For he is journalist, hear him roar. Oh- excuse me, he is columnist hear him roar. Yes we must go back to the same old strategy and do it all again. Because it has worked so well all these years. Right Eugene? It's led to genuine peace and prosperity for the Palestinians and has marginalized and defeated terror groups like Hezbollah, right?
Other stalwarts of the Bush administration's grandiose schemes seem exhausted — Rumsfeld is more philosopher than conqueror when he talks about Iraq these days, while Cheney bizarrely sticks with the story that everything's just fine. But Rice's life story — little black girl from Birmingham rises to become secretary of state, somehow becoming a hawkish Republican along the way — and her obvious potential in politics still make her an intriguing figure. I personally know three people who are writing books about her.
Now, in her first real test as secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice will be judged on more than her impressive résumé, her obvious intelligence, her poise on the world stage and her fashion sense. Now she has her own war to sort out, and all she's done so far is scare people with her talk of somehow making the world's tinderbox into something "new."
Here his condescension reaches new depths heights depths (Hell, you decide). A little black girl? Her fashion sense? Say what? If you said that to her face, she'd be justified to put you, and your attitude, on the floor with a right cross.
And you know what? I'd cheer her on.
But she wouldn't. She's got more class than you. By about a mile or so. No, more than that.







