Chicago Commits Economic Suicide

A "victory" for people promoting legislation to force large retailers to pay a so-called living wage in Chicago will virtually guarantee that the city of Chicago will see no large retailers bring tax revenue or much needed jobs to the city.

The world's largest retailer suffered a blow on Wednesday when Chicago aldermen passed a bill that requires big-box stores, including Wal-Mart, to pay a so-called living wage. The ordinance could curb Wal-Mart's appetite to build stores in the city limits.

But it's not stopping the company's longstanding plans to blanket the Chicago suburbs with Supercenters, the giant stores that sell general merchandise and groceries.

Indeed, Wal-Mart for the first time has a veteran supermarket executive planted in Chicago, signaling that big changes are ahead.

Michael J. Lewis, president of Wal-Mart's Midwest division, sees millions of consumers hungry for Wal-Mart's low-priced groceries and envisions operating 40 Supercenters in the Chicago area in the next three years by building new stores and expanding existing stores. Wal-Mart currently has only a handful of Supercenters in the outlying suburbs.

"Our share of the market is relatively low in Chicago," said Lewis. "And that's an opportunity for us. We think there's tremendous opportunity to double or even triple our market share in Chicagoland."

That expansion is a threat to Jewel and Dominick's, the Chicago area's two major supermarket chains, where workers are unionized and where prices are generally 15 to 30 percent higher than those at Wal-Mart.

In an interview at Wal-Mart's Chicago office last week, Lewis said if the city council approved the bill, Wal-Mart would "put more time and effort in the suburbs," in particular focusing on those close to the city in order to draw shoppers across city lines.

"It would stand to reason that we would ring Chicago with Supercenters," Lewis said.

Late Wednesday in a written statement issued after the Chicago vote, Lewis added, "Our preference is to serve the people of Chicago in their communities and we will do what we can to keep up with significant consumer demand from city residents." The official statement didn't address whether Wal-Mart would carry through with threats to avoid opening stores within the city limits.

Good thinking guys. This was a not even well hidden push by the unionized stores (and the unions) to keep Wal-Mart out, not a victory for the people. Because they'll suffer for the decision.