Retreating
Sebastian Mallaby, a Washington Post writer I have taken exception to before, has a column in Monday's WaPo. Ah, the parade of tired out clichés is quite enormous - and revealing:
The first lesson is that allies do matter, and so does the global public opinion that creates, or fails to create, a political climate in which governments feel able to work with the United States. The Bush administration has at times skated past this truth, correctly believing that doing the right thing can matter more than doing the popular thing. But it has learned, slowly and painfully, that doing right gets to be impossible if your unpopularity becomes toxic. To address any major foreign policy challenge, from Iran to North Korea to Darfur, you need international backing.
Ah, yes. And so Clinton's adventure into Kosovo should be denounced?
The second lesson is that, just because European diplomats inhabit a fantasyland, it does not follow that the opposite to European policy is sound. This truth was ignored in the run-up to the Iraq war, when the French and others called for diplomatic containment of Saddam Hussein even though they themselves had undermined the sanctions option. This infuriating hypocrisy, and its obvious uselessness in dealing with a threat that Western intelligence agencies believed real, allowed the alternative policy offered by the Bush administration to escape scrutiny. U.S. officials spent their time explaining why the French option was unworkable — an easy case to make. But they were not forced to answer enough questions about whether the intelligence on Iraq's weapons program was solid or whether they were prepared for the challenges of democratic reconstruction.
Oh, the tried and true WMD argument. Except that the failure of Iraq to meet the conditions of the ceasefire was always - always - sufficient grounds for going to war. Violating a ceasefire has always been recognized as such.
Which brings us to the third foreign policy lesson: Wars are more easily begun than won. It's not only Iraq that illustrates this; just look at Afghanistan, where the Taliban fights on. But the Bush administration, having apparently learned skepticism of military options since the Iraq imbroglio, veered back toward credulity when it came to Lebanon.
So, because it is not easy, we should walk away? Then how many domestic policies should we abandon because they are not easy?
Mallaby misses the obvious - should we go back to the same solutions? Again? The ceasefires that allow terror groups to expand and gain ever more dangerous weapons? Really, is that the retreat we must make, Mr. Mallaby?
John Randolph of Virginia once described a brilliant but corrupt colleague thus: He shines and stinks like a rotten mackerel by moonlight.
That describes Mallaby's ideas rather well.





