I noted yesterday that John "Cool Hat Luke" Kerry had attacked Joe Lieberman. The embattled Senator from Connecticut also noted the attack and called it for what it was – a hack job by a hack with ambitions. Lieberman also distanced himself from the White House by calling for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation (not for the first time, either). But he also noted that we simply cannot abandon the Iraqis.
Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the war in Iraq.
Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.
"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."
Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into Iraq "to secure the country."
"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go on and live happily ever after," he said.
Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to contain sectarian violence."
"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.
….
Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.
"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."
"As bad as things are now — and they've gotten worse in the last six months — it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a position Ned Lamont has taken."
Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.
Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by somebody who has ambitions of his own."
"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S. Senate," he said.
"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of, a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100 percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic Party."
Lieberman is quite correct to worry about that. For all the claims of lockstep in the Republican party, the left wing of the Democrats would cement an even more rigid ideological purity test on the Democrats. It is one that is a recipe for disaster for the party and more centrist Democrats know it.
