The Democrat’s Wal-Mart Jihad
Obviously, anyone who reads here knows how I feel about the Democrat's appallingly stupid jihad against Wal-Mart. But hey, if they really think driving the over 120 million people who shop there each week away from their party is a good policy, why should I bother speaking out? Besides, there are others doing a very nice job of eviscerating the foolishness.
Like Jonah Goldberg (another opinion from the LA Times. Is this Kansas anymore?)
The New York Times reported recently that the Democrats have, en masse, declared their party to be the enemy of the mega-box store. Sen. Joe Biden Jr. (D-Del.) recently delivered a "blistering attack" on the company at an anti-Wal-Mart rally in Iowa, and other Democrats have appeared at similar events. Indeed, one of the few times Lieberman and Lamont appeared at the same event during their primary contest was at an anti-Wal-Mart clambake in the Nutmeg State.
This bonfire of buffoonery is helping me learn to love Wal-Mart. First, let's talk politics. More people shop at Wal-Mart every week (127 million) than voted in the 2004 presidential election, according to a company website. They are disproportionately low-income folks who, by some estimates, are collectively saving hundreds of billions of dollars by shopping there.
Compounding the electoral asininity is the glorious hypocrisy of it all. Hillary Rodham Clinton — who returned a donation from the devilish retailer — was on Wal-Mart's board of directors from the mid-1980s until the 1992 presidential campaign. If the store's policies are so un-Progressive, how come it never occurred to her to do anything about it until now? Similarly, former would-be First Lady Teresa Heinz attacked the store in 2004, saying it "destroys communities" — which apparently never stopped her from hawking her ketchup there or owning $1 million in Wal-Mart stock. Even Lamont, the golden boy of the new yuppie populism, owns a few thousand bucks of Wal-Mart stock.
The most delicious moment in the WMDS hysteria came last week, when civil rights icon Andrew Young had what some are calling his Mel Gibson moment. Hired as a flack for Wal-Mart, Young gave an interview to the black-owned Los Angeles Sentinel in which he celebrated Wal-Mart's role as a destroyer of small, locally owned stores. Wal-Mart, he explained, "ran the 'mom and pop' stores out of my neighborhood. But, you see, these are the people who have been overcharging us — selling us stale bread, and bad meat and wilted vegetables. And they sold out and moved to Florida. I think they've ripped off our communities enough. First it was Jews, then it was Koreans, and now it's Arabs; very few black people own these stores."
But, to really get the full flavor of the derangement over Wal-Mart, you really must read Ezra Klein's attack on Goldberg. That should clarify the utterly Clue Proof™ reasoning at work on the left. Klein is impervious to the fact that any raise in pay and benefits to Wal-Mart employees will come at the cost of higher prices to consumers or fewer jobs at Wal-Mart. His wails at the loss of mom-and-pop store jobs neglects the fact that those jobs likely paid minimum wage and did not include any benefits whatsoever. Which demonstrates, I suspect, that Mr. Klein never worked in retail for a mom-and-pop. Or generally has any clue what he is talking about. (Which QandO proves rather handily).






