<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Note About The New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; China Clamps Down On News Services</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-20271</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; China Clamps Down On News Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-20271</guid>
		<description>[...] We can already be pretty certain that the New York Times will preemptively surrender to these news blackout rules since they have already demonstrated their willingness to obey British laws they are not subject to (even when they misinterpret them). While being above US law, of course. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We can already be pretty certain that the New York Times will preemptively surrender to these news blackout rules since they have already demonstrated their willingness to obey British laws they are not subject to (even when they misinterpret them). While being above US law, of course. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticky Notes</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-19704</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticky Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 01:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-19704</guid>
		<description>Interesting follow up. I got in a bit of a twist the first time I posted about the NYT honoring Britain&#039;s &quot;laws&quot; but not ours. They are just unbelievable. Pun intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting follow up. I got in a bit of a twist the first time I posted about the NYT honoring Britain&#8217;s &#8220;laws&#8221; but not ours. They are just unbelievable. Pun intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress &#187; All the news that&#8217;s fit to read elsewhere UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-18449</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress &#187; All the news that&#8217;s fit to read elsewhere UPDATED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-18449</guid>
		<description>[...] :::UPDATE::: BlueCrab Boulevard finds that England had no problem reporting on the material the NY Times said they could not. Interesting. Sad. :::END UPDATE::: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] :::UPDATE::: BlueCrab Boulevard finds that England had no problem reporting on the material the NY Times said they could not. Interesting. Sad. :::END UPDATE::: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-18426</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-18426</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I did get that wrong. Or the spell check did and I approved it without really catching I was approving the wrong word - which is still my fault. Or flaunt. Or flout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I did get that wrong. Or the spell check did and I approved it without really catching I was approving the wrong word &#8211; which is still my fault. Or flaunt. Or flout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Walker</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-18424</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-18424</guid>
		<description>Would I be a terrible pedant if I mentioned that I think you mean &quot;flouting&quot; where you say &quot;flaunting?&quot; Fox News made the same mistake today. I&#039;m not sure if it was the same context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be a terrible pedant if I mentioned that I think you mean &#8220;flouting&#8221; where you say &#8220;flaunting?&#8221; Fox News made the same mistake today. I&#8217;m not sure if it was the same context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-18410</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-18410</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NY Times can&#039;t find way to Credit Bush Administration for the Economy...&lt;/strong&gt;

I heard that a newspaper exists to provide a service to the people. If this is true then perhaps the nation would be better served if the New York Times closed shop.

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NY Times can&#39;t find way to Credit Bush Administration for the Economy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I heard that a newspaper exists to provide a service to the people. If this is true then perhaps the nation would be better served if the New York Times closed shop.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All The News That&#8217;s Fit To Blackout</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-18400</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All The News That&#8217;s Fit To Blackout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/08/30/a-note-about-the-new-york-times/#comment-18400</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Don&#039;t miss this beautiful irony. It seems the Times of London has no problem publishing the same information the NYT did and even credits the NYT as the source! The NYT&#160;can&#039;t even get the legal facts straight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Don&#39;t miss this beautiful irony. It seems the Times of London has no problem publishing the same information the NYT did and even credits the NYT as the source! The NYT&nbsp;can&#39;t even get the legal facts straight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

