“We Simply Go On. . .”
The words of Adel Abdul Mahdi, the Vice President of Iraq to reporters grilling him about what is happening in Iraq. Mahdi came to Washington to try to ascertain the intent of the United States. For while politicians and pundits here talk blithely about whether or not to withdraw US forces, there is no withdrawal for the people in Iraq.
The mostly bad news from Iraq this summer left a lot of people in Washington, including a few in the Bush administration, feeling confused, anxious and doubtful about whether the Iraqi government can deliver on its promise to stabilize the country. As it turns out, some of Iraq's most powerful leaders have had similar feelings as they have watched the news from Washington.
That was the message of a quiet pre-Labor Day visit here by Adel Abdul Mahdi, who has been one of America's key allies in the attempt to replace Saddam Hussein's totalitarianism with a democratic political system. Mahdi is now Iraq's vice president, but he called his meetings with President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and key senators and congressmen a "private visit."
In fact, he was here to deliver a message, and ask a question, on behalf of Shiite Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, who remains Iraq's single most influential figure — and the linchpin of the past 40 months of political reconstruction. Sistani's message to Bush, Mahdi told a group of reporters I joined last week, was that "Iraqis are sticking to the principles of the constitution and democracy." But the ayatollah wanted to know if the United States is still on board as well.
"It's a critical moment. We want to be sure that we understand perfectly what's going on, and what is the real strategy of the United States in Iraq," Mahdi said. "We read in the press about different perspectives and attitudes. That's why we want to be clear — whether there is a Plan B."
We have in this country a vehement debate going on. I happen to be one of the people who firmly believe that pulling out of Iraq right now would be an unmitigated disaster for this country. Others have equally strong opinions in the other direction. Fine, we disagree. But (isn't there always a "but"?) what happens to those we leave behind if we leave? That, I think, is why Mahdi was here. Our press would indicate to anyone looking in at the US that we are in disarray and are failing open on our allies and those who depend on us.
If you believe, really believe, that we should not have gone to war in Iraq, fine. But do you really want the blood on your hands that a pullout would surely lead to? The Iraqis are asking, begging, for us not to leave them. They need time to make it work. The signals our own people are sending are killing them.
And may well kill us.
UPDATE: QandO with some parsing of the numbers.






