<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ned Lamont Gets Sucker-Punched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzyblog &#187; E-mails Never Forget, Mr. Lamont</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzyblog &#187; E-mails Never Forget, Mr. Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20234</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE 4 &#8212; More reax: Wizbang, Moderate Voice, Blue Crab Boulevard. UPDATE 5 &#8212; The Lamont team channels Bob McEwen. This is the core of the Lamont campaign&#8217;s reaction (from the Times follow-up; bold is mine): His [Lamontâ€™s] campaign manager, Tom Swan, did not address the content of the e-mail message, but said: â€œIt is clear that Senator Lieberman would prefer to try to cloud Nedâ€™s statements from eight years ago, instead of talking about the important issues of national security, the war in Iraq, and health care. It is shocking to see his Senate staff, at taxpayer expense, is spending their time trying to make up dirt on Ned Lamont.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE 4 &#8212; More reax: Wizbang, Moderate Voice, Blue Crab Boulevard. UPDATE 5 &#8212; The Lamont team channels Bob McEwen. This is the core of the Lamont campaign&#8217;s reaction (from the Times follow-up; bold is mine): His [Lamontâ€™s] campaign manager, Tom Swan, did not address the content of the e-mail message, but said: â€œIt is clear that Senator Lieberman would prefer to try to cloud Nedâ€™s statements from eight years ago, instead of talking about the important issues of national security, the war in Iraq, and health care. It is shocking to see his Senate staff, at taxpayer expense, is spending their time trying to make up dirt on Ned Lamont.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch!</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20228</guid>
		<description>All you gotta do to save the situation is invoke &#039;Rove&#039; and the usual cardboard catchphrases, huh Billy Boy? Dream on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you gotta do to save the situation is invoke &#8216;Rove&#8217; and the usual cardboard catchphrases, huh Billy Boy? Dream on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20198</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20198</guid>
		<description>You know Bill/Jim/Whatever you are almost becoming a cartoon of yourself at the moment. If the Rovian hordes funneled millions to Lieberman, where exactly are the records of the donations? That would take a lot of maxed out donors wouldn&#039;t it? I posted about this, by the way. Pointed out the obvious, too.

And a Senator who is *gasp* can actually &lt;i&gt;search his own files&lt;/i&gt;! My God, man, do you know what this means! Not everyone in the world is clueless!

Not everyone is quite this gullible. Sorry you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Bill/Jim/Whatever you are almost becoming a cartoon of yourself at the moment. If the Rovian hordes funneled millions to Lieberman, where exactly are the records of the donations? That would take a lot of maxed out donors wouldn&#8217;t it? I posted about this, by the way. Pointed out the obvious, too.</p>
<p>And a Senator who is *gasp* can actually <i>search his own files</i>! My God, man, do you know what this means! Not everyone in the world is clueless!</p>
<p>Not everyone is quite this gullible. Sorry you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Franklin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20195</guid>
		<description>Outstanding!  Those 70 million dollars in GOP raised funds (presumably given by donors who thought they were helping the GOP) is enabling Lieberman to dig up everything he can on Lamont.  That plus those &quot;swiftboating&quot; commericals for Lieberman must be making Karl Rove smile confidently.  Whatever it takes to maintain the Iraq occupation!  That all Lieberman is useful for anyway.

http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Lieberman2.htm

File this under &quot;RightLeft-Wing&quot; -- If such a catagory existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding!  Those 70 million dollars in GOP raised funds (presumably given by donors who thought they were helping the GOP) is enabling Lieberman to dig up everything he can on Lamont.  That plus those &#8220;swiftboating&#8221; commericals for Lieberman must be making Karl Rove smile confidently.  Whatever it takes to maintain the Iraq occupation!  That all Lieberman is useful for anyway.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Lieberman2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Lieberman2.htm</a></p>
<p>File this under &#8220;RightLeft-Wing&#8221; &#8212; If such a catagory existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20143</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;From Ned With Love...&lt;/strong&gt;



Well, we all know by now that Ned Lamont criticized Joe Lieberman recently for how he handled the Lewinsky affair. In short, he said that he agreed with Lieberman&#039;s......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From Ned With Love&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, we all know by now that Ned Lamont criticized Joe Lieberman recently for how he handled the Lewinsky affair. In short, he said that he agreed with Lieberman&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CALIFORNIA  YANKEE</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/comment-page-1/#comment-20141</link>
		<dc:creator>CALIFORNIA  YANKEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/09/ned-lamont-gets-sucker-punched/#comment-20141</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lamont Flip Flops On Lieberman&#039;s Lament...&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times reports Connecticutâ€™s millionaire anti-war Democratic Senate candidate, Ned Lamont wasn&#039;t always critical of Senator Lieberman&#039;s 1998 rebuke of President Clinton over Clinton&#039;s affair with Monica Lewinski. Lamont wrote to Senato...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamont Flip Flops On Lieberman&#8217;s Lament&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times reports Connecticutâ€™s millionaire anti-war Democratic Senate candidate, Ned Lamont wasn&#8217;t always critical of Senator Lieberman&#8217;s 1998 rebuke of President Clinton over Clinton&#8217;s affair with Monica Lewinski. Lamont wrote to Senato&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

