In stating the obvious that many of us on the right side of the blogosphere have known for some time, the question is moot – and McCain has made himself that as well. …

When a United States Senator peacocks around and blocks rational interogation techniques such as sleep deprivation, loud sounds and bright lights, grabbing a suspect’s shirt, prolonged standing, and hypothermia, in order to score political points, he …

And by the way, do you think Senator Warner is just trying to get votes, too? Lindsey Graham, too? Colin Powell, too?

If someone disagrees with you, is the only possible explanation that they have venal motives? Is it possible that someone might disagree with you for a principled reason?

Have you ever turned out to be wrong when you were sure you were right? Ever? If you haven’t, you need to get a cape and tight suit.

When you attack someone’s motives rather than addressing his arguments, do you think you are persuading people who may be listening to you?