<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodpeckers In The News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-22222</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/#comment-22222</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I could see it happening, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I could see it happening, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cousin Dave</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-22221</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/25/woodpeckers-in-the-news/#comment-22221</guid>
		<description>The concern now has to be that the FWS&#039;s response to this will be to apply the designations ex post facto, issue fines, and impose land restrictions anyway.  Clearly unconstitutional -- but who&#039;s got the bucks to fight them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concern now has to be that the FWS&#8217;s response to this will be to apply the designations ex post facto, issue fines, and impose land restrictions anyway.  Clearly unconstitutional &#8212; but who&#8217;s got the bucks to fight them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

