The Danger Of Overplaying A Hand

Untitled document

At least there are some folks who are not fans of the Republican party and who are pulling for the Democrats in November who are trying to sound a cautious note about the Foley matter. I have not seen one person on the Right defend Foley, in any way whatsoever. But I have been seeing attempts to whip up a frenzy coming from the left. John Dickerson sees a potential pitfall here.

Democrats would be happy with either outcome. But there's a potentially ugly side to their glee: For this scandal to cause lasting damage to GOP leaders, Democrats may have to use homophobia in a way usually associated with the Republican Party.

….

The ultimate judgment of this affair may be that it's just more dumb behavior by Republican leaders, and that may be enough to help Democrats with the midterm election, especially if this incident is seen as the final insult. But voters, particularly Republican voters, might pay attention to the facts (assuming more ugly ones don't come out) and use them to absolve their party's leaders. Sure, they could have handled the situation better, but who could know that Foley was going after young boys?

If that's how Republicans respond, this won't be the political doom Democrats hope it will be. The saga has too much political potential for them to allow that to happen. The narrative is far easier to understand than the Jack Abramoff scandal, and at least in the early rounds, the pressure has caused GOP leaders to point fingers at each other. But for this to become a brush fire may require courting homophobes to generate sustained and impenetrable outrage.

I noted this same thing last night and a number of others have also noted it. By trying to badly overplay what is frankly all about one bad actor, the Democrats risk a serious backlash in the long run. There have been a number of actually much worse scandals in the past where Democrats have gotten away with it. Now they want to bring down more than just the one person who is really at fault here. A dangerous precedent for a party with so many skeletons in the closet. A politically deadly move to invoke homophobia as a strategy and alienate a core constituency.

But then, the Democrats this year have a rather bad track record on the use of double-edged weapons. I suspect this one may also wound them almost as much as their targets.

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Danger Of Overplaying A Hand

  1. syn says:

    The Calvin Klein fashionista crowd will be none to happy finding themselves on the receiving end of this ‘sensational sex scandel’ smear tactic they had spent the last two decades actively working to overcome.

    If anything this saga will end the ‘right to privacy’ argument held by those wishing to protect and defend their lifestyle choices. At the very least this will certainly end the ‘houseboys for hollywood moguls’ industry fer sure man.

    Seriously, I cannot help but think that Foley was set-up by a false sense of BoyToy security. Maby it is that I live in NYC and am around BoyToys who love to manipulated older gay men’s lust for youthful sex which leds me to my conclustion but if the shoe fits….

    Hey the dem like to throw Oreo cookies at black conservatives why would they not throw sexual enticements for scandal towards gay conservatives?

    More importantly, ddes this mean Tennessese Williams is a pedophile for his lustful words written towards youthful boys?

  2. syn says:

    I really need to preview before I post, my apology to the host.

  3. Nell says:

    Agreed. If I were gay, I wouldn’t be too happy seeing how the party that is supposedly supportive of gay marriage for 18 year olds treats a story about one man writing nasty stuff to 16 year olds as if it is so radioactive that everyone in his party should lose their jobs merely for being in that party with him. I’d be wondering if perhaps I’d been pandered to by people who have those same phobias they constantly accuse others of having.

  4. Pingback: Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » Apples ≠ Oranges

  5. Pingback: A Blog For All

Comments are closed.