South Park Skewers 9/11 “Truthers”

Untitled document

Truthers skewer themselves even more. WuzzaDem harvests some "Truther Chat" and reveals the way in which Truthers react when someone giggles at them.

What Could Be Funnier Than An Episode Of South Park That Makes Fun of 9/11 "Truthers"?

I'll tell you what: The "truthers" discussing the possible impact of said South Park episode on "the movement." (Broken link removed)

Micayah:

My guess is they will completely make fun of 9/11 truth movement.

Good guess, but "truther" Method feels the need to keep Micayah honest after that remark:

Question – If that happens, is it going to stop you from doing your own investigative research and spreading the truth?

Even IF thats the case, who cares? We aren't trying to win any popularity contest. Our goal is spreading truth, not becoming homecoming king/queen.

Not trying to win a popularity contest? The hell you say!

Meanwhile, 911wasaninsidejob is disappointed with South Park's creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone:

Man i used to have a lot of respect for trey and matt until now, I can see exactly where this is going, they are going to completely make fun of our entire movement and make everyone in our generation (pretty much everyone watches south park in the 10-20 age range) laugh at the "conspiracies" of 9/11…why did they do this?

Why, Trey and Matt? WHY? I mean, don't they usually take jabs at people who are already making asses out of themselves?

Please do read it all – it gets funnier. Greg Tinti at The Political Pit Bull has the video. So you can laugh at the Truthers being laughed at. Don't forget to laugh at the Truthers, too!

UPDATE: Oh, you must see this. It is truly hysterical. Dude.

This entry was posted in Insanity, Left Wing. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to South Park Skewers 9/11 “Truthers”

  1. RatMan says:

    At appx 3.5 seconds into the video, you can see a squib on the collapsing tower, near the bottom middle of the screen. There is no reasonable way to explain this occurence via “the pancaking” theory. This squib appears to be around 35-40 floors below the actual collapse when it first appears. I froze the the squib from the video and made a “still” . I am guessing the debunkers will claim this was caused from “air pressure,” which would mean the other 35-40 floors were “air tight.” (impossible)

    http://rattube.com/blog1/2006/10/10/wtc-2-demolition-911/

  2. Gaius says:

    As they say in South Park, 1/4 of all Americans……

  3. “…they are going to completely make fun of our entire movement and make everyone in our generation (pretty much everyone watches south park in the 10-20 age range) laugh at the “conspiracies” of 9/11…why did they do this?”

    Err… because you morons leave yourselves wide open for it, you curd chewing chumps.

    Now get off my lawn!

  4. At appx 3.5 seconds into the video, you can see a squib on the collapsing tower, near the bottom middle of the screen. There is no reasonable way to explain this occurence via “the pancaking” theory.

    Unless you can read English. Here’s an animation that provides an even better view than your lame “still”, along with an explanation:

    http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm

    Conspiracy theories are often built around anomalies which are difficult to prove either way. The “assumptionists” are convinced they know what the anomaly is. One such anomaly is the so called “Squibs”.

    They say this anomaly is an explosive charge going off and a sure sign of Controlled Demolition. It’s often followed by more video of charges going off in real Controlled Demolitions. But if we examine the anomaly closely, we see these [would be] explosives work in reverse to an explosive blast. They tend to spurt out and then increase with time. An explosive works in reverse to this. Its strongest point is the moment the charge is set off. It doesn’t increase its explosive strength with time.

    So what is this then? Why would debris jet out of windows far below the collapse?

    It could be a number of things, by themselves or in combination. One reasonable explanation is a buildup of pressure caused by the compression of air between the floors as they pancaked, pushed debris out of the already broken windows and/or open vents. Another is falling debris like elevators or elevator parts/motors and/or columns free falling down the elevator shafts and slamming into lower floors creating debris. In a sense the floors are large plungers and the towers are just one big Syringe during the collapse.

    I am guessing the debunkers will claim this was caused from “air pressure,” which would mean the other 35-40 floors were “air tight.” (impossible)

    You must be “guessing” debunkers will make this claim because you’ve read it already, and dismissed it because it doesn’t fit the conclusion you’re hanging on to.

    What’s your field of expertise, “RatMan”? If you’re going to say this explanation is “impossible”, I assume you can back that up with something other than a clip from “Loose Brains”.

    You should do some reading at something other than 9-11 conspiracy sites, but try pulling your nose out of Dylan Avery’s ass first – you’ll be able to see better that way.

  5. Gaius says:

    We here at Blue Crab Boulevard specialize in the TRUTH! Because we know for a fact that all hamsters are not named “Frank”.

    http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/21/the-face-on-mars/

  6. Pingback: The Right Nation

  7. RatMan says:

    Seriously, you people surprise me. In order for the squib to appear 40 floors below, that would require the preceeding 39 floors to be airtight.. just like your brains !!!!!!!!!!!!! USE LOGIC !!!!!!! the writers of south park are laughing at you guys… they know who did it.

    http://www.RatTube.com

  8. Gaius says:

    Perhaps you should learn physics and engineering.

Comments are closed.