http://www.RatTube.com

L’ultimo episodio di South Park trasmesso oltreoceano, dal bizzarro titolo “Mystery of the Urinal Deuce”, oltre ad essere uno dei più divertenti delle ultime stagioni, è una critica devastante alle teorie cospiratorie sull’11 settembre che stanno…

http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/09/21/the-face-on-mars/

Unless you can read English. Here’s an animation that provides an even better view than your lame “still”, along with an explanation:

http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm

Conspiracy theories are often built around anomalies which are difficult to prove either way. The “assumptionists” are convinced they know what the anomaly is. One such anomaly is the so called “Squibs”.

They say this anomaly is an explosive charge going off and a sure sign of Controlled Demolition. It’s often followed by more video of charges going off in real Controlled Demolitions. But if we examine the anomaly closely, we see these [would be] explosives work in reverse to an explosive blast. They tend to spurt out and then increase with time. An explosive works in reverse to this. Its strongest point is the moment the charge is set off. It doesn’t increase its explosive strength with time.

So what is this then? Why would debris jet out of windows far below the collapse?

It could be a number of things, by themselves or in combination. One reasonable explanation is a buildup of pressure caused by the compression of air between the floors as they pancaked, pushed debris out of the already broken windows and/or open vents. Another is falling debris like elevators or elevator parts/motors and/or columns free falling down the elevator shafts and slamming into lower floors creating debris. In a sense the floors are large plungers and the towers are just one big Syringe during the collapse.

I am guessing the debunkers will claim this was caused from “air pressure,” which would mean the other 35-40 floors were “air tight.” (impossible)

You must be “guessing” debunkers will make this claim because you’ve read it already, and dismissed it because it doesn’t fit the conclusion you’re hanging on to.

What’s your field of expertise, “RatMan”? If you’re going to say this explanation is “impossible”, I assume you can back that up with something other than a clip from “Loose Brains”.

You should do some reading at something other than 9-11 conspiracy sites, but try pulling your nose out of Dylan Avery’s ass first – you’ll be able to see better that way.

Err… because you morons leave yourselves wide open for it, you curd chewing chumps.

Now get off my lawn!

http://rattube.com/blog1/2006/10/10/wtc-2-demolition-911/