An Interesting Question

Having long since mentioned the "mutually beneficial spiral of death" that binds the mainstream media so tightly to the terrorists, this is really not so very surprising. But Snapped Shot makes a very, very interesting point. Would the media send reporters to cover a press conference where the Ku Klux Klan was showing of their new murder weapons to kill people?

Reuters is beginning to weigh in on this event. Their version of events sounds somewhat different than the AP's version, with the group, rather than the rocket being given the euphemistic title, and completely ignoring the new and improved Jew-killing weaponry. Could this be Abed trying to spin events? Did Reuters misunderstand what is going on there? Or is the Associated Press wrong?

Somebody has some 'splaining to do.

For those of you who might be new to Snapped Shot, this is not the first time that the press has coddled up to terrorist "press conferences." Just close your eyes for a second and see if you can picture the media showing up to a press conference organized by the Klu Klux Klan, and reporting on the Klan as glowingly as they do these murderous scum. After seeing photos like these, that picture really isn't all that hard for me to picture any longer. How about you?

The blind one-sidedness of the press continues to amaze me.

So, the question for Reuters and the Associated Press comes down to this: when you send reporters to get a story like this, where do you draw the line? One presumes neither agency would consider covering a KKK media event where they bragged about the newest rockets they intended to launch into black neighborhoods, right?

So killing Jews is OK with these agencies? Providing press coverage and photos of groups with no other agenda than killing civilians who all happen to be Jews, is just peachy? (Oh, sorry, they do also kill the occasional Arab Israeli, but they just consider them additional martyrs.) But where is that line drawn? I guess we have an answer from the wire services.

Through Israel's existence, it would appear.