Leaking As Usual

The old expression was "business as usual", but this seems a better fit for the new/old politics of consensus by leak that seems to predominate these days. The ship of the Iraq Study Group, which has had all the watertight integrity of the Titanic, now gushes, in an arterial way, to the New York Times. "Iraq Panel to Recommend Pullback of Combat Troops" the headline screams.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 — The bipartisan Iraq Study Group reached a consensus on Wednesday on a final report that will call for a gradual pullback of the 15 American combat brigades now in Iraq but stop short of setting a firm timetable for their withdrawal, according to people familiar with the panel’s deliberations.

The report, unanimously approved by the 10-member panel, led by James A. Baker III and Lee H. Hamilton, is to be delivered to President Bush next week. It is a compromise between distinct paths that the group has debated since March, avoiding a specific timetable, which has been opposed by Mr. Bush, but making it clear that the American troop commitment should not be open-ended. The recommendations of the group, formed at the request of members of Congress, are nonbinding.

A person who participated in the commission’s debate said that unless the government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki believed that Mr. Bush was under pressure to pull back troops in the near future, “there will be zero sense of urgency to reach the political settlement that needs to be reached.”

The report recommends that Mr. Bush make it clear that he intends to start the withdrawal relatively soon, and people familiar with the debate over the final language said the implicit message was that the process should begin sometime next year.

The report leaves unstated whether the 15 combat brigades that are the bulk of American fighting forces in Iraq would be brought home, or simply pulled back to bases in Iraq or in neighboring countries. (A brigade typically consists of 3,000 to 5,000 troops.) From those bases, they would still be responsible for protecting a substantial number of American troops who would remain in Iraq, including 70,000 or more American trainers, logistics experts and members of a rapid reaction force.

As the commission wound up two and a half days of deliberation in Washington, the group said in a public statement only that a consensus had been reached and that the report would be delivered next Wednesday to President Bush, Congress and the American public. Members of the commission were warned by Mr. Baker and Mr. Hamilton not to discuss the contents of the report.

So as not to interfere with the official unofficial leakage, apparently. This is the old, cold warrior, realpolitick "realism" and the old methodology for politics. It never really went away, did it? Politics by trial balloon and leak. And now the terminal leak, where the wisdom of the Baker group is revealed in an officially unofficial way.

I hate this way of doing business. I really do.

• 

  By Watcher, Thursday, 30 November , 2006 @ 12:08 am

  Who the hell came up with the idea for this idiotic commission anyway?

  The last person the world needs to hear from right now is James Baker.

Other Links to this Post

1. The Heretik : A Quick Study — Thursday, 30 November , 2006 @ 12:34 am

2. The American Street » Blog Archive » A Quick Study — Thursday, 30 November , 2006 @ 10:20 am