<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;But What Is Needed Now&#8230;..&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Republican</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/comment-page-1/#comment-53169</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/#comment-53169</guid>
		<description>&quot;Frankly, there should have been more on the ground sooner. That is looking back with 20/20 hindsight, of course.&quot;

Hindsight? Hardly. General Shenseki (sp?) testified BEFORE the war that we would need &quot;several hundred thousand&quot; troops for the occupation. Over the course of 2003, it became very easy to see he was right -- if anything, his figure was too low. The Bush Administration denied reality for three long years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Frankly, there should have been more on the ground sooner. That is looking back with 20/20 hindsight, of course.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hindsight? Hardly. General Shenseki (sp?) testified BEFORE the war that we would need &#8220;several hundred thousand&#8221; troops for the occupation. Over the course of 2003, it became very easy to see he was right &#8212; if anything, his figure was too low. The Bush Administration denied reality for three long years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finnegan</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/comment-page-1/#comment-53167</link>
		<dc:creator>Finnegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/#comment-53167</guid>
		<description>I agree that there should have been more troops on the ground to begin with. From what I&#039;ve read, it sounds like a lot of the violence and instability could have been prevented if security had been in place from the beginning. That said, I&#039;m not convinced that escalation or surge or whatever we call it, is going to accomplish security and stability in the current environment. I thought this article in Time was very interesting:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1573037,00.html
We may be looking at a situation like Kosovo where the different sects have to just be completely segregated for the foreseeable future. I&#039;m not as familiar with the structure of the Iraqi government as I&#039;d like to be, but it seems like trying to forge a coalition at the top level is probably hopeless, and that divided government at the local level may be the best way to go. 

I would like to hear about a concrete plan that&#039;s drastically different from what we&#039;re doing now before I&#039;d support putting a larger number of our troops in harm&#039;s way. I&#039;ve been hearing for 3 years now that the Iraqis are almost ready to take over their own security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there should have been more troops on the ground to begin with. From what I&#8217;ve read, it sounds like a lot of the violence and instability could have been prevented if security had been in place from the beginning. That said, I&#8217;m not convinced that escalation or surge or whatever we call it, is going to accomplish security and stability in the current environment. I thought this article in Time was very interesting:<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1573037,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1573037,00.html</a><br />
We may be looking at a situation like Kosovo where the different sects have to just be completely segregated for the foreseeable future. I&#8217;m not as familiar with the structure of the Iraqi government as I&#8217;d like to be, but it seems like trying to forge a coalition at the top level is probably hopeless, and that divided government at the local level may be the best way to go. </p>
<p>I would like to hear about a concrete plan that&#8217;s drastically different from what we&#8217;re doing now before I&#8217;d support putting a larger number of our troops in harm&#8217;s way. I&#8217;ve been hearing for 3 years now that the Iraqis are almost ready to take over their own security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael P.F. van der Galien</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/comment-page-1/#comment-53163</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael P.F. van der Galien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/#comment-53163</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lieberman Calls for More Troops...&lt;/strong&gt;

the violence has escalated so much now, the division is so big... that I believe that whatever the U.S. or the Iraqi government does, will not be suffice....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lieberman Calls for More Troops&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>the violence has escalated so much now, the division is so big&#8230; that I believe that whatever the U.S. or the Iraqi government does, will not be suffice&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confederate Yankee</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/comment-page-1/#comment-53160</link>
		<dc:creator>Confederate Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/#comment-53160</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Worlds Apart...&lt;/strong&gt;

It isn&#039;t likely that you needed a litmus test to gauge the widely divergent viewpoints on the Iraq War, but on the off chance that you did, Senator Joe Lieberman provided it in spades in an op-ed published in today&#039;s......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Worlds Apart&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t likely that you needed a litmus test to gauge the widely divergent viewpoints on the Iraq War, but on the off chance that you did, Senator Joe Lieberman provided it in spades in an op-ed published in today&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/comment-page-1/#comment-53153</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2006/12/29/but-what-is-needed-now/#comment-53153</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lieberman Pisses off the Dems...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jolting Joe did the unforgivable though, in the eyes of the far left and the anti-war, anti-military Democrats... He used the words &quot;win&quot; and &quot;victory&quot; in regards to Iraq. OMG....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lieberman Pisses off the Dems&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jolting Joe did the unforgivable though, in the eyes of the far left and the anti-war, anti-military Democrats&#8230; He used the words &#8220;win&#8221; and &#8220;victory&#8221; in regards to Iraq. OMG&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

