<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re On Your Own, Ted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53746</guid>
		<description>Kathy,
&quot;What about the 56% of Americans who think the Iraq war has gone much worse than Bush expected it to go?  Think itâ€™s logical to believe that 56% supports sending more troops?&quot;
Response: Actually, that number is probably closer to 99%.  Included in that count is President Bush himself; by his own words btw.  And one has nothing to do with the other.  To suggest that the American people DONâ€™T want a different direction just because the current strategy has gone worse that the President expected is a HUGE LEAP.

&quot;72% of Americans who disapprove of the way Bush has handled the Iraq war are in favor of escalating the war?&quot;
Response: The war is escalating without the added troops.  THATâ€™S the problem.  The troops are to stop-gap and reverse the tide of escalation.  To take the term â€œescalate troop levelsâ€ to mean â€œescalate warâ€ is a liberal twist.  Besides, raising troop levels and giving those troops a different mandate than the current troops is doing something different, which 72% of Americans want.  Admittedly, some of the 72% would like to cut-and-run and rely on the good will of the jihadist NOT to rape their daughters when they finally reach our shores, but there is no evidence to suggest that many and certainly not most of the 72% want to lose.

â€œYOU think itâ€™s still possible to â€œwinâ€ in Iraqâ€
Response: Yes I do, I donâ€™t hate my country.

â€œYOU donâ€™t want to admit that the U.S. war against Iraq is an utter, abject failureâ€
Response: Base on THAT comment, YOU should stop trying to keep President Bush from fighting this war since up till now your efforts to keep Bush from fighting this war have been an â€œabject failureâ€.  If you feel instead that your effort might succeed in the future despite the results up till now, then why do you deny such a reality for those who donâ€™t want to cow-tow to the jihadists and feel a new strategy COULD work better than the current strategy.

â€œYou are saying that the 57% of Americans who now believe that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake are supportive of sending more troops to Iraq?â€
Response: Once again BIG LEAP.  And even youâ€™re statement is revealing: â€œwho now believeâ€.  So based on your statement, when we actually DID go into Iraq it was right?  Itâ€™s was only a mistake because â€œNOWâ€ they feel that way?

â€œYou are saying that the 72% of Americans who believe that Pres. Bush does not have a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq would believe that sending 20,000 more troops to spot the Iraqi army fighting Shiites in Sadr City is a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq?â€
Response:  Once again, youâ€™re LEAPING to conclusions.  Maybe they would.  One does not negate the other.  And btw, 80% of Americans believe that the Democrats donâ€™t have a plan, not alone a clear plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy,<br />
&#8220;What about the 56% of Americans who think the Iraq war has gone much worse than Bush expected it to go?  Think itâ€™s logical to believe that 56% supports sending more troops?&#8221;<br />
Response: Actually, that number is probably closer to 99%.  Included in that count is President Bush himself; by his own words btw.  And one has nothing to do with the other.  To suggest that the American people DONâ€™T want a different direction just because the current strategy has gone worse that the President expected is a HUGE LEAP.</p>
<p>&#8220;72% of Americans who disapprove of the way Bush has handled the Iraq war are in favor of escalating the war?&#8221;<br />
Response: The war is escalating without the added troops.  THATâ€™S the problem.  The troops are to stop-gap and reverse the tide of escalation.  To take the term â€œescalate troop levelsâ€ to mean â€œescalate warâ€ is a liberal twist.  Besides, raising troop levels and giving those troops a different mandate than the current troops is doing something different, which 72% of Americans want.  Admittedly, some of the 72% would like to cut-and-run and rely on the good will of the jihadist NOT to rape their daughters when they finally reach our shores, but there is no evidence to suggest that many and certainly not most of the 72% want to lose.</p>
<p>â€œYOU think itâ€™s still possible to â€œwinâ€ in Iraqâ€<br />
Response: Yes I do, I donâ€™t hate my country.</p>
<p>â€œYOU donâ€™t want to admit that the U.S. war against Iraq is an utter, abject failureâ€<br />
Response: Base on THAT comment, YOU should stop trying to keep President Bush from fighting this war since up till now your efforts to keep Bush from fighting this war have been an â€œabject failureâ€.  If you feel instead that your effort might succeed in the future despite the results up till now, then why do you deny such a reality for those who donâ€™t want to cow-tow to the jihadists and feel a new strategy COULD work better than the current strategy.</p>
<p>â€œYou are saying that the 57% of Americans who now believe that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake are supportive of sending more troops to Iraq?â€<br />
Response: Once again BIG LEAP.  And even youâ€™re statement is revealing: â€œwho now believeâ€.  So based on your statement, when we actually DID go into Iraq it was right?  Itâ€™s was only a mistake because â€œNOWâ€ they feel that way?</p>
<p>â€œYou are saying that the 72% of Americans who believe that Pres. Bush does not have a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq would believe that sending 20,000 more troops to spot the Iraqi army fighting Shiites in Sadr City is a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq?â€<br />
Response:  Once again, youâ€™re LEAPING to conclusions.  Maybe they would.  One does not negate the other.  And btw, 80% of Americans believe that the Democrats donâ€™t have a plan, not alone a clear plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah &#187; Dems determined to repeat &#8216;nam defeat with a defeat in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53742</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah &#187; Dems determined to repeat &#8216;nam defeat with a defeat in Iraq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53742</guid>
		<description>[...] Crab Boulevard    Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Iraq, Middle East, Congress  &#124; EMail This Post &#124; Print This Post &#124; &#160;&#160;      Trackback URI for this post:http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/trackback/ &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crab Boulevard    Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Iraq, Middle East, Congress  | EMail This Post | Print This Post | &nbsp;&nbsp;      Trackback URI for this post:http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/trackback/ &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53738</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53738</guid>
		<description>So you are saying that the 60-plus percent of Americans who are opposed to sending more troops to Iraq if Pres. Bush says he is going to do that (as opposed to hypothetically) are actually in favor of sending more troops to Iraq?

You are saying that the 72% of Americans who disapprove of the way Bush has handled the Iraq war are in favor of escalating the war?

What about the 56% of Americans who think the Iraq war has gone much worse than Bush expected it to go? Think it&#039;s logical to believe that 56% supports sending more troops?

Here&#039;s what I think: YOU want Pres. Bush to send more troops. YOU think it&#039;s still possible to &quot;win&quot; in Iraq. YOU don&#039;t want to admit that the U.S. war against Iraq is an utter, abject failure. And although large majorities of Americans, AND military commanders in Iraq, AND large numbers of U.S. soldiers in Iraq (if not majorities), AND almost every military and foreign policy expert in Washington do not believe that sending more troops will make anything better in Iraq, YOU still want to do it -- so you have to project your own desires onto the larger American public, because otherwise you would have to admit that your position has almost no support at all.

You are saying that the 57% of Americans who now believe that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake are supportive of sending more troops to Iraq?

You are saying that the 72% of Americans who believe that Pres. Bush does not have a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq would believe that sending 20,000 more troops to spot the Iraqi army fighting Shiites in Sadr City is a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are saying that the 60-plus percent of Americans who are opposed to sending more troops to Iraq if Pres. Bush says he is going to do that (as opposed to hypothetically) are actually in favor of sending more troops to Iraq?</p>
<p>You are saying that the 72% of Americans who disapprove of the way Bush has handled the Iraq war are in favor of escalating the war?</p>
<p>What about the 56% of Americans who think the Iraq war has gone much worse than Bush expected it to go? Think it&#8217;s logical to believe that 56% supports sending more troops?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I think: YOU want Pres. Bush to send more troops. YOU think it&#8217;s still possible to &#8220;win&#8221; in Iraq. YOU don&#8217;t want to admit that the U.S. war against Iraq is an utter, abject failure. And although large majorities of Americans, AND military commanders in Iraq, AND large numbers of U.S. soldiers in Iraq (if not majorities), AND almost every military and foreign policy expert in Washington do not believe that sending more troops will make anything better in Iraq, YOU still want to do it &#8212; so you have to project your own desires onto the larger American public, because otherwise you would have to admit that your position has almost no support at all.</p>
<p>You are saying that the 57% of Americans who now believe that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake are supportive of sending more troops to Iraq?</p>
<p>You are saying that the 72% of Americans who believe that Pres. Bush does not have a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq would believe that sending 20,000 more troops to spot the Iraqi army fighting Shiites in Sadr City is a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress &#187; Dems: Bush is for it, so we&#8217;re against it</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53733</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress &#187; Dems: Bush is for it, so we&#8217;re against it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53733</guid>
		<description>[...] As Blue Crab points out here, America did not vote the Dems in by giving them &#8220;a mandate to lose the war.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As Blue Crab points out here, America did not vote the Dems in by giving them &#8220;a mandate to lose the war.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bRight &#38; Early</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53722</link>
		<dc:creator>bRight &#38; Early</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53722</guid>
		<description>Kathy, you are incredibly deluded if you really believe that, &quot;Democrats in Congress are STILL out of their minds scared to death of King George.&quot; They are scared of only one thing -- losing power. 

They seized on the publics discontent with the war to win back the majorities, but they realize (even if you do not) that discontent with the war and the way it is being waged is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; the same thing as backing policies that leads to defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy, you are incredibly deluded if you really believe that, &#8220;Democrats in Congress are STILL out of their minds scared to death of King George.&#8221; They are scared of only one thing &#8212; losing power. </p>
<p>They seized on the publics discontent with the war to win back the majorities, but they realize (even if you do not) that discontent with the war and the way it is being waged is <em>not</em> the same thing as backing policies that leads to defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53706</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53706</guid>
		<description>Gaius, you are incredibly deluded if you really believe that. Large majorities of Americans oppose the war and strongly disapprove of the way Bush has handled it. Most Americans think that the war in Iraq has made us less safe, not more. Over 60% of Americans oppose sending more troops to Iraq.

Have you forgotten that Republicans were kicked out of their majority in Congress, Gaius? That did not happen because Americans want Bush to send more troops to Iraq and continue the war for at least the next two years. Americans did not put Democrats in power to see them vote for and support the same old disastrous Republican policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaius, you are incredibly deluded if you really believe that. Large majorities of Americans oppose the war and strongly disapprove of the way Bush has handled it. Most Americans think that the war in Iraq has made us less safe, not more. Over 60% of Americans oppose sending more troops to Iraq.</p>
<p>Have you forgotten that Republicans were kicked out of their majority in Congress, Gaius? That did not happen because Americans want Bush to send more troops to Iraq and continue the war for at least the next two years. Americans did not put Democrats in power to see them vote for and support the same old disastrous Republican policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53703</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53703</guid>
		<description>Wrong, Kathy. They are out of their minds scared of the American public &lt;i&gt;who did not give them a mandate to lose a war and will kill them at the polls if they do.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, Kathy. They are out of their minds scared of the American public <i>who did not give them a mandate to lose a war and will kill them at the polls if they do.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/comment-page-1/#comment-53702</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/01/09/youre-on-your-own-ted/#comment-53702</guid>
		<description>The authors of that &quot;nonbinding resolution&quot; are just as furious with the escalation of this war as Ted Kennedy is, but, unlike him, they do not have the guts to do anything about it.

Despite record-high percentages of Americans who are opposed to any troop increase, Democrats in Congress are STILL out of their minds scared to death of King George. They are *terrified.* It&#039;s really quite pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The authors of that &#8220;nonbinding resolution&#8221; are just as furious with the escalation of this war as Ted Kennedy is, but, unlike him, they do not have the guts to do anything about it.</p>
<p>Despite record-high percentages of Americans who are opposed to any troop increase, Democrats in Congress are STILL out of their minds scared to death of King George. They are *terrified.* It&#8217;s really quite pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

