<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forward Into The Past</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55428</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On Nonbinding Votes...&lt;/strong&gt;

...is there anyone out there asking how this move will improve the US security posture in the region, long term national security, or long term strategic interests in the Middle East and around the world, especially when al Qaeda is still active in I.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On Nonbinding Votes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;is there anyone out there asking how this move will improve the US security posture in the region, long term national security, or long term strategic interests in the Middle East and around the world, especially when al Qaeda is still active in I&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajacksonian</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55426</link>
		<dc:creator>ajacksonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55426</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember when Congress and the White House and the Pentagon and all of K-Street and Foggy Bottom got moved to the Green Zone... all of those are plenty far enough away to &#039;rethink&#039; things.

Whenever I hear any Congresscritter complain about the &#039;lack of supplies&#039; I do remember who sets the plans, outlays, budgets, and actually ensures that these things get bought:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/02/vc-post-pork-is-for-terrorists.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;.  I have problems complaining about the execution of any War when those in charge of the logistics, supply and outlay of the entire DoD do not do their job.  That is &lt;a href=&quot;http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/02/incompetent-congress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Congress&lt;/a&gt;.

Complain about lack of supplies?  Congress.
Complain about not enough production?  Congress.
Complain about beat up equipment?  Congress.

That is their job to ensure these things are planned for and addressed and, as we are reminded BY THEM, they will jolly well spend MORE if they think it needs to be done and they have done so for decades... on Pork.  Lots of Pork put into the DoD which detracts from their jobs as they must track those projects above and beyond their normal duties of defending the Nation.  Yes, Pork has taken precedence over bullets.

Those in Congress complain about the Executive when it is THEIR job to keep things running smoothly and the supplies coming rapidly.  Not the Executive&#039;s.

Perhaps we could retreat from Congress and re-think the scenario a bit?  Because it certainly is a quagmire in that swampland reclaimed to situate the Capitol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember when Congress and the White House and the Pentagon and all of K-Street and Foggy Bottom got moved to the Green Zone&#8230; all of those are plenty far enough away to &#8216;rethink&#8217; things.</p>
<p>Whenever I hear any Congresscritter complain about the &#8216;lack of supplies&#8217; I do remember who sets the plans, outlays, budgets, and actually ensures that these things get bought:  <a href="http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/02/vc-post-pork-is-for-terrorists.html" rel="nofollow">Congress</a>.  I have problems complaining about the execution of any War when those in charge of the logistics, supply and outlay of the entire DoD do not do their job.  That is <a href="http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/02/incompetent-congress.html" rel="nofollow">Congress</a>.</p>
<p>Complain about lack of supplies?  Congress.<br />
Complain about not enough production?  Congress.<br />
Complain about beat up equipment?  Congress.</p>
<p>That is their job to ensure these things are planned for and addressed and, as we are reminded BY THEM, they will jolly well spend MORE if they think it needs to be done and they have done so for decades&#8230; on Pork.  Lots of Pork put into the DoD which detracts from their jobs as they must track those projects above and beyond their normal duties of defending the Nation.  Yes, Pork has taken precedence over bullets.</p>
<p>Those in Congress complain about the Executive when it is THEIR job to keep things running smoothly and the supplies coming rapidly.  Not the Executive&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Perhaps we could retreat from Congress and re-think the scenario a bit?  Because it certainly is a quagmire in that swampland reclaimed to situate the Capitol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brass</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55425</link>
		<dc:creator>Brass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55425</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t get my head around the cut-and-run crowd.  Do they really want another Vietnam?  Are they so clueless as to the consequences of leaving the middle east in total chaos?  We have run one of the &quot;cleanest&quot; wars in the history of the world and the reason we have the problems we do is because of the pussy-footing around.  

The left trumpets the statistic that 60-some-odd % of Americans don&#039;t approve of the way the war is run.  That may be true, however, a good 20% of those just believe we need to do it harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t get my head around the cut-and-run crowd.  Do they really want another Vietnam?  Are they so clueless as to the consequences of leaving the middle east in total chaos?  We have run one of the &#8220;cleanest&#8221; wars in the history of the world and the reason we have the problems we do is because of the pussy-footing around.  </p>
<p>The left trumpets the statistic that 60-some-odd % of Americans don&#8217;t approve of the way the war is run.  That may be true, however, a good 20% of those just believe we need to do it harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebeccaH</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55421</link>
		<dc:creator>RebeccaH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55421</guid>
		<description>The out-of-touch Defeatocrats have absolutely no idea how much the memory of what happened in Vietnam sticks in the craw of most ordinary Americans.  We do not want another helicopter on the embassy roof scenario, and the resultant humiliation of America trumpeted around the world, thank you very much.  If they want to show their support for our troops, then &lt;b&gt;Let Them Win&lt;/b&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The out-of-touch Defeatocrats have absolutely no idea how much the memory of what happened in Vietnam sticks in the craw of most ordinary Americans.  We do not want another helicopter on the embassy roof scenario, and the resultant humiliation of America trumpeted around the world, thank you very much.  If they want to show their support for our troops, then <b>Let Them Win</b>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55417</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55417</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re on the record of approving of the genocide that will follow? Just asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re on the record of approving of the genocide that will follow? Just asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/comment-page-1/#comment-55416</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/02/18/forward-into-the-past-4/#comment-55416</guid>
		<description>The damage is in remaining; getting out allows us to rethink and move forward with a coherent strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The damage is in remaining; getting out allows us to rethink and move forward with a coherent strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

