<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guilty Verdict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Miller</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56138</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56138</guid>
		<description>ARMITAGE &quot;outed&quot; Plame and, whatever nonsense being spouted here might claim, she was NOT an undercover agent of the CIA and thus her identity was NOT protected.  Wilson is pathetic, his wife is an enabler and they are BOTH liars.  What is more, Fitzgerald KNEW who the leaker was long BEFORE he even spoke with Libby - so can we say POLITICAL PROSECUTION here folks?  Fitzgerald was hired to find the leaker - Armitage was the leaker and Fitzgerald knew it.  So what was this lengthy trial all about?  Politics, my friends, nothing more nor less than politics.  Dirty politics at that!

And on CNN last night, despite the FACTS in evidence, Larry King still was wanting to interject Karl Rove into the mix!  Pathetic BDS sufferers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARMITAGE &#8220;outed&#8221; Plame and, whatever nonsense being spouted here might claim, she was NOT an undercover agent of the CIA and thus her identity was NOT protected.  Wilson is pathetic, his wife is an enabler and they are BOTH liars.  What is more, Fitzgerald KNEW who the leaker was long BEFORE he even spoke with Libby &#8211; so can we say POLITICAL PROSECUTION here folks?  Fitzgerald was hired to find the leaker &#8211; Armitage was the leaker and Fitzgerald knew it.  So what was this lengthy trial all about?  Politics, my friends, nothing more nor less than politics.  Dirty politics at that!</p>
<p>And on CNN last night, despite the FACTS in evidence, Larry King still was wanting to interject Karl Rove into the mix!  Pathetic BDS sufferers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56135</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56135</guid>
		<description>Sure, Bill. This would be along the same lines as the absolutely gauranteed, no-fooling, any second now, really, honest, indictment of Cheney that was all the rage a short time ago?

Dream on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Bill. This would be along the same lines as the absolutely gauranteed, no-fooling, any second now, really, honest, indictment of Cheney that was all the rage a short time ago?</p>
<p>Dream on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Franklin</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56130</guid>
		<description>Libby is just a tool that the bulldog needs to get the big fish.  Now that the conviction is in we&#039;ll see what kind of deals are made... Even the jury recognized this trial was just a means to an end.

Cheney&#039;s retirement &quot;for health reasons&quot; over the next couple weeks would be quite coincidental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libby is just a tool that the bulldog needs to get the big fish.  Now that the conviction is in we&#8217;ll see what kind of deals are made&#8230; Even the jury recognized this trial was just a means to an end.</p>
<p>Cheney&#8217;s retirement &#8220;for health reasons&#8221; over the next couple weeks would be quite coincidental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56129</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56129</guid>
		<description>Libby didn&#039;t commit the original crime by not outting Plame&#039;s identity so Fitzgerald found something else with which to prosecute Libby who is on Cheney&#039;s staff. 

Wilson and Plame, the reason for this travesty, are about to become Hollywood&#039;s new dream heroes who will re-enact the their crime of setting up the Bush administration as liars. 

Plame was not a covert CIA agent at the time, Wilson lied in his NY TImes op-ed about yellowcake and Niger but Libby is convicted, not for the original crime but a new Fitzgerald manufactured crime, Libby&#039;s perjury for failing to remember exactly what he said to a reporter about Plame&#039;s non-covert identity.

How come there is no concern that the CIA claimed that it was the White House  (specifically Cheney) who sent Wilson when it was Wilson&#039;s wife who set up the trip?  And, how come Wilson conveniently returned with an accessment that Niger/yellowcake had nothing to do with Saddam (a lie itself since Bush stated that British intelligence have determined that Saddam was attempting to procure uraniumn from Africa) and published this lie in an op-ed of the NY Times.


The Bush Lied crowd was conned by some world-class con-artists but their hatred of Bush is so profound they accept the con without hestitation. In other words, blinded by groupthink.

It is easy to see how Bushhaters believe without question in Al Goracle&#039;s Global Warming hoax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libby didn&#8217;t commit the original crime by not outting Plame&#8217;s identity so Fitzgerald found something else with which to prosecute Libby who is on Cheney&#8217;s staff. </p>
<p>Wilson and Plame, the reason for this travesty, are about to become Hollywood&#8217;s new dream heroes who will re-enact the their crime of setting up the Bush administration as liars. </p>
<p>Plame was not a covert CIA agent at the time, Wilson lied in his NY TImes op-ed about yellowcake and Niger but Libby is convicted, not for the original crime but a new Fitzgerald manufactured crime, Libby&#8217;s perjury for failing to remember exactly what he said to a reporter about Plame&#8217;s non-covert identity.</p>
<p>How come there is no concern that the CIA claimed that it was the White House  (specifically Cheney) who sent Wilson when it was Wilson&#8217;s wife who set up the trip?  And, how come Wilson conveniently returned with an accessment that Niger/yellowcake had nothing to do with Saddam (a lie itself since Bush stated that British intelligence have determined that Saddam was attempting to procure uraniumn from Africa) and published this lie in an op-ed of the NY Times.</p>
<p>The Bush Lied crowd was conned by some world-class con-artists but their hatred of Bush is so profound they accept the con without hestitation. In other words, blinded by groupthink.</p>
<p>It is easy to see how Bushhaters believe without question in Al Goracle&#8217;s Global Warming hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56125</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56125</guid>
		<description>Cody, you are convinced that Libby lied to obstruct an investigation. But you do so with no proof that a crime was actually committed for Libby to have lied about in the first place. You do not see this because you have a predetermined verdict already in place. 

Prosecurors have an almost unlimited ability to get an indictment. The old saw about the ham sandwich comes to mind. But Fitz could not get enough information from all the people that he grilled? He had to settle for claiming Libby lied. There is, whether you see it or not, something very wrong in that. 

And Wilson&#039;s Who&#039;s Who entry negates everything about Plame being covert, does it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cody, you are convinced that Libby lied to obstruct an investigation. But you do so with no proof that a crime was actually committed for Libby to have lied about in the first place. You do not see this because you have a predetermined verdict already in place. </p>
<p>Prosecurors have an almost unlimited ability to get an indictment. The old saw about the ham sandwich comes to mind. But Fitz could not get enough information from all the people that he grilled? He had to settle for claiming Libby lied. There is, whether you see it or not, something very wrong in that. </p>
<p>And Wilson&#8217;s Who&#8217;s Who entry negates everything about Plame being covert, does it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56123</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56123</guid>
		<description>Respectfully, you would acquit those accused of perjury if the underlying crime was not proven.  But here the purpose of the perjury is to interfere with the investigation into that underlying crime.  So if I am accused of a crime, and I lie to interfere with the investigation of that crime, and because of my lie it becomes impossible to prove the crime but it can be proven that I lied, then you would acquit me as long as I successfully derailed the investigation with my lie?  It seems to me that you are simply rewarding those who lie well enough to successfully derail investigations into these underlying crimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully, you would acquit those accused of perjury if the underlying crime was not proven.  But here the purpose of the perjury is to interfere with the investigation into that underlying crime.  So if I am accused of a crime, and I lie to interfere with the investigation of that crime, and because of my lie it becomes impossible to prove the crime but it can be proven that I lied, then you would acquit me as long as I successfully derailed the investigation with my lie?  It seems to me that you are simply rewarding those who lie well enough to successfully derail investigations into these underlying crimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56121</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56121</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;And the Verdict Is......&lt;/strong&gt;

It is curious that the jury thought that Libby was less trustworthy than Tim Russert or Matt Cooper, when it came down to it though the jury did find that Cooper wasn&#039;t nearly as trustworthy as Russert. All had motives here to be less than forthcomin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>And the Verdict Is&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It is curious that the jury thought that Libby was less trustworthy than Tim Russert or Matt Cooper, when it came down to it though the jury did find that Cooper wasn&#8217;t nearly as trustworthy as Russert. All had motives here to be less than forthcomin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4d20</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56120</link>
		<dc:creator>r4d20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56120</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How come none is concerned with a covert shadow government operating within the Washington Beltway?&lt;/i&gt;

How come no one is concerned with the secret alien technology stored at Area 51?

It&#039;s because we&#039;re not interested in wasting our time with stupid conspiracy theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How come none is concerned with a covert shadow government operating within the Washington Beltway?</i></p>
<p>How come no one is concerned with the secret alien technology stored at Area 51?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because we&#8217;re not interested in wasting our time with stupid conspiracy theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakesville</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56119</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakesville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56119</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Libby Verdict: Guilty on Four Out of Five Counts...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Libby trial verdict is in: Vice President Dick Cheney&#8217;s former chief of staff, I. Lewis &#8220;Scooter&#8221; Libby, was convicted Tuesday of lying and obstructing a leak investigation that reached into the highest levels of the Bush administ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Libby Verdict: Guilty on Four Out of Five Counts&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Libby trial verdict is in: Vice President Dick Cheney&#8217;s former chief of staff, I. Lewis &#8220;Scooter&#8221; Libby, was convicted Tuesday of lying and obstructing a leak investigation that reached into the highest levels of the Bush administ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56118</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56118</guid>
		<description>Crimes were committed. Lying before a grand jury is a crime.

Any crime about outting CIA personnel is still possible, but the Libby trial wasn&#039;t about that issue.

All Libby had to do was say nothing, or simply say I don&#039;t remember, he didn&#039;t. He activly answered the questions put to him. He blew it. But Libby is just a minion of the VP office. If you&#039;ve been around the world long enough little fish problems are always linked to big fish troubles. 

With all the information out there and I had to place bets, I&#039;d bet Cheney was up to his eyesballs in this;
Which is stupid because all Cheney had to do was ignore Wilson&#039;s report.

As Washington insiders like to note: &quot;It&#039;s not the crime, It&#039;s the cover up that kills you.&quot;

Very interesting trial, but I have to agree with the jury on this one.

I have the feeling Fritz is like a wolf lurking in the dark awaiting the VP&#039;s office next move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crimes were committed. Lying before a grand jury is a crime.</p>
<p>Any crime about outting CIA personnel is still possible, but the Libby trial wasn&#8217;t about that issue.</p>
<p>All Libby had to do was say nothing, or simply say I don&#8217;t remember, he didn&#8217;t. He activly answered the questions put to him. He blew it. But Libby is just a minion of the VP office. If you&#8217;ve been around the world long enough little fish problems are always linked to big fish troubles. </p>
<p>With all the information out there and I had to place bets, I&#8217;d bet Cheney was up to his eyesballs in this;<br />
Which is stupid because all Cheney had to do was ignore Wilson&#8217;s report.</p>
<p>As Washington insiders like to note: &#8220;It&#8217;s not the crime, It&#8217;s the cover up that kills you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very interesting trial, but I have to agree with the jury on this one.</p>
<p>I have the feeling Fritz is like a wolf lurking in the dark awaiting the VP&#8217;s office next move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56117</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I think it is wrong to prosecute someone when the underlying crime that supposedly occurred to set the entire investigation in motion has never been proved to have occurred.&lt;/i&gt;

Help me out here. Prosecutors are supposed to be able to prove their cases even when there&#039;s obstruction of justice?  

Prosecuting obstruction itself is &quot;wrong,&quot; and of course the crime will never be found out as long as the accused can lie with impunity!

Excellent social model described here; no conviction of anything, ever. 

Everyone on board with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I think it is wrong to prosecute someone when the underlying crime that supposedly occurred to set the entire investigation in motion has never been proved to have occurred.</i></p>
<p>Help me out here. Prosecutors are supposed to be able to prove their cases even when there&#8217;s obstruction of justice?  </p>
<p>Prosecuting obstruction itself is &#8220;wrong,&#8221; and of course the crime will never be found out as long as the accused can lie with impunity!</p>
<p>Excellent social model described here; no conviction of anything, ever. </p>
<p>Everyone on board with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syn</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56115</link>
		<dc:creator>syn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56115</guid>
		<description>How come none is interested in finding out why the CIA sent a retired foreign diplomat (Wilson) to find out information as to Niger&#039;s potential sale of yellowcake to Saddam then lie about sending such retired diplomat by claiming that retired diplomat was sent by the White House whne in fact the perosn who suthorized the retired diplomats trip to Niger was none other than the retired diplomat&#039;s wife who was not a covert CIA agent?

How come none is concerned with a covert shadow government operating within the Washington Beltway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come none is interested in finding out why the CIA sent a retired foreign diplomat (Wilson) to find out information as to Niger&#8217;s potential sale of yellowcake to Saddam then lie about sending such retired diplomat by claiming that retired diplomat was sent by the White House whne in fact the perosn who suthorized the retired diplomats trip to Niger was none other than the retired diplomat&#8217;s wife who was not a covert CIA agent?</p>
<p>How come none is concerned with a covert shadow government operating within the Washington Beltway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bRight &#38; Early</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56114</link>
		<dc:creator>bRight &#38; Early</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Libby Verdict Roundup...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are some of the reactions of sites on my blogrolls talking about today&#8217;s verdict in the Scooter Libby trial.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Libby Verdict Roundup&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here are some of the reactions of sites on my blogrolls talking about today&#8217;s verdict in the Scooter Libby trial.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate's Cove</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56113</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate's Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56113</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scooter Watch: Yeah, We Know He Was Found Guilty...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;m sure everyone and their mother is blogging it. One thing I would point out
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney&#039;s former chief of staff, I. Lewis &quot;Scooter&quot; Libby, was convicted Tuesday of lying and obstructing a leak investigat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scooter Watch: Yeah, We Know He Was Found Guilty&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#39;m sure everyone and their mother is blogging it. One thing I would point out<br />
WASHINGTON &#8211; Vice President Dick Cheney&#39;s former chief of staff, I. Lewis &quot;Scooter&quot; Libby, was convicted Tuesday of lying and obstructing a leak investigat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Miller</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-56109</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/06/guilty-verdict/#comment-56109</guid>
		<description>We can stop playing the Dems favorite game here folks - moral equivalency has nothing whatsoever to do with this farcical prosecution.  Millions of OUR dollars were spent, and for what?  Joe Wilson had identified his wife as as &quot;CIA Employee&quot; long before any of this crap happened in his own &quot;Who&#039;s Who&quot; entry.  Her identity wasn&#039;t a secret.  She wasn&#039;t undercover.  Libby shouldn&#039;t have been prosecuted, nor should Martha Stewart have been prosecuted. However, what they were trying to make clear is you don&#039;t LIE to Federal investigators when they come a calling.  

WORD TO THE WISE:  Standing MUTE is a good policy.

As to President Clinton - HE LIED TO A GRAND JURY and he lost his law license (which he has never bothered to retrieve) and he admitted those lies only when he was forced to do so. Again, the man whose duty it was to defend and protect the people and the CONSTITUTION of the United States LIED TO A GRAND JURY.  And as an attorney, he really, truly should have known better and behaved more appropriately.  But then, he was a lawyer - what can you expect!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can stop playing the Dems favorite game here folks &#8211; moral equivalency has nothing whatsoever to do with this farcical prosecution.  Millions of OUR dollars were spent, and for what?  Joe Wilson had identified his wife as as &#8220;CIA Employee&#8221; long before any of this crap happened in his own &#8220;Who&#8217;s Who&#8221; entry.  Her identity wasn&#8217;t a secret.  She wasn&#8217;t undercover.  Libby shouldn&#8217;t have been prosecuted, nor should Martha Stewart have been prosecuted. However, what they were trying to make clear is you don&#8217;t LIE to Federal investigators when they come a calling.  </p>
<p>WORD TO THE WISE:  Standing MUTE is a good policy.</p>
<p>As to President Clinton &#8211; HE LIED TO A GRAND JURY and he lost his law license (which he has never bothered to retrieve) and he admitted those lies only when he was forced to do so. Again, the man whose duty it was to defend and protect the people and the CONSTITUTION of the United States LIED TO A GRAND JURY.  And as an attorney, he really, truly should have known better and behaved more appropriately.  But then, he was a lawyer &#8211; what can you expect!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

