<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ahem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This and That - March 16th, 2007 &#171; Lighthouse Patriot Journal</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/comment-page-1/#comment-56511</link>
		<dc:creator>This and That - March 16th, 2007 &#171; Lighthouse Patriot Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/#comment-56511</guid>
		<description>[...] * Isnâ€™t it odd that the Democrats main theme in the general election of 2006 was that there had to be an exact pull-out date for US troops in Iraq, yet the Senate in a recent voting session could not get the 60 votes required to create a cloture concerning withdrawal demands. Why have the Democrats balked, now that they are a majority? Because, for the most part, they do not want to be the blame for what could happen if the troops are withdrawn before their mission is a success. Also, their ideology is based upon their rhetoric that it is Americaâ€™s fault, its leadership of the Bush administration, that has caused continued and increase in terrorist activities â€“ yet will not admit that giving in to those that promote violence and civil war in Iraq will be clear winners if the US troops are pulled out before they complete their mission of ensuring that law and order is established and that the Iraqi government and its infrastructure is secure enough to go it alone. The result of the withdrawal resolution failed with 48 senators voting in favor of it and 50 against it. President Bush threatened to veto the bill if it reached his desk. Yet, President Bush will not veto a bill that comes to his desk that promotes his wacky idea that proving more guest worker permits and generally amnesty will help the illegal immigration situation. This has been peculiar to me since the President professes to be for improving national security, but allows the situation that has allowed those belonging to and affiliated with terrorist organizations to use the southern border as their access to America and developing and sustaining the terrorist cell activities in the underground network within our nation. This must be frustrating to those who are supposed to take care of our security problems, like the FBI and the American intelligence system. [See Blue Crab Boulevard]. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * Isnâ€™t it odd that the Democrats main theme in the general election of 2006 was that there had to be an exact pull-out date for US troops in Iraq, yet the Senate in a recent voting session could not get the 60 votes required to create a cloture concerning withdrawal demands. Why have the Democrats balked, now that they are a majority? Because, for the most part, they do not want to be the blame for what could happen if the troops are withdrawn before their mission is a success. Also, their ideology is based upon their rhetoric that it is Americaâ€™s fault, its leadership of the Bush administration, that has caused continued and increase in terrorist activities â€“ yet will not admit that giving in to those that promote violence and civil war in Iraq will be clear winners if the US troops are pulled out before they complete their mission of ensuring that law and order is established and that the Iraqi government and its infrastructure is secure enough to go it alone. The result of the withdrawal resolution failed with 48 senators voting in favor of it and 50 against it. President Bush threatened to veto the bill if it reached his desk. Yet, President Bush will not veto a bill that comes to his desk that promotes his wacky idea that proving more guest worker permits and generally amnesty will help the illegal immigration situation. This has been peculiar to me since the President professes to be for improving national security, but allows the situation that has allowed those belonging to and affiliated with terrorist organizations to use the southern border as their access to America and developing and sustaining the terrorist cell activities in the underground network within our nation. This must be frustrating to those who are supposed to take care of our security problems, like the FBI and the American intelligence system. [See Blue Crab Boulevard]. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quilly Mammoth</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/comment-page-1/#comment-56510</link>
		<dc:creator>Quilly Mammoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/03/15/ahem-3/#comment-56510</guid>
		<description>I am now ROFLMAO.  I haven&#039;t put on the HAZMAT suit to venture to the Moonbat Caverns deep in the Fever Swamps but I&#039;ll bet they are frothing..seared even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now ROFLMAO.  I haven&#8217;t put on the HAZMAT suit to venture to the Moonbat Caverns deep in the Fever Swamps but I&#8217;ll bet they are frothing..seared even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

