I've been laughing – a lot – at the sudden scrutiny that has been turned on Al "Gorezilla" Gore and his phony, hypocritical message. The mainstream media, as John Fund points out today, has turned on the former Vice President and current shrill alarmist. They are really putting the screws to Gorezilla, too. And people are starting to notice.
The media are finally catching up with Al Gore. Criticism of his anti-global-warming franchise and his personal environmental record has gone beyond ankle-biting bloggers. It's now coming from the New York Times and the Nashville Tennessean, his hometown paper that put his birth, as a senator's son, on its front page back in 1948, and where a young Al Gore Jr. worked for five years as a journalist.
Last Tuesday, the Times reported that several eminent scientists "argue that some of Mr. Gore's central points [on global warming] are exaggerated and erroneous." The Tenessean reported yesterday that Mr. Gore received $570,000 in royalties from the owners of zinc mines who held mineral leases on his farm. The mines, which closed in 2003 but are scheduled to reopen under a new operator later this year, "emitted thousands of pounds of toxic substances and several times, the water discharged from the mines into nearby rivers had levels of toxins above what was legal."
All of this comes in the wake of the enormous publicity Mr. Gore received after his documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar. The film features Mr. Gore reprising his famous sighing and lamenting how the average American's energy use is greedily off the charts. At the film's end viewers are asked, "Are you ready to change the way you live?"
The Nashville-based Tennessee Center for Policy Research was skeptical that Mr. Gore had been "walking the walk" on the environment. It obtained public records showing that for years Mr. Gore has burned through more electricity at his Nashville home each month than the average American family uses in a year–and his consumption was increasing. The heated Gore pool house alone ran up more than $500 in natural-gas bills every month.
Mr. Gore's office responded by claiming that the Gores "purchase offsets for their carbon emissions to bring their carbon footprint down to zero." But CNSNews.com reports that Mr. Gore doesn't purchase carbon offsets with his own resources, and that they are meaningless in terms of global warming.
The offset purchases are actually made for him by Generation Investment Management, a London-based investment firm that Mr. Gore co-founded, and which provides carbon offsets as a fringe benefit to all 23 of its employees, ensuring that they require no real sacrifice on the part of Mr. Gore or his family. Indeed, their impact is also highly limited. The Carbon Neutral Co.–one of the two vendors that sell offsets to Mr. Gore's company, says that offset purchases "will be unable to reduce greenhouse gas emissions . . . in the short term."
That last bit is actually news to me. I had no idea that not only is Gorezilla purchasing medieval indulgences for himself, from himself, but that it is an employee benefit as well! It's a triple play! Read the whole thing. Fund beats heck out of the Tennessee strip-mining baron and his sanctimonious admonitions for others to change their ways. (Apparently, that will leave more for Gorezilla to consume.) I predicted that Gorezilla and his Oscar would end up backfiring on the true believers of the First Church of the Presumptuous Assumption of Global Warming®. It's happening even faster than I thought it would.




I have noticed the MSM turning on algore as well. Instead of circling the wagons and defending him, they are allowing the skeptics to be heard. Does anyone have a theory why they are doing this? After all, the MSM still believes in Global Warming, and algore has been adulated as an oracle for months.
I’ve been waiting for them to notice that his eyes are always spinning counterclockwise!
Thing is that carbon offsets are traded on markets. They have a market value. In some countries, if you want to build a power plant, the company must buy carbon offsets equal to the amount of CO2 produced. In theory, as more plants are produced, the carbon offsets get harder to come by and cost more to obtain. At some point (so the theory goes) it becomes cheaper to build some kind of CO2 mitigation/sequestration.
The point is, the more successful Gore is at getting places to clamp down on CO2 emissions, the more valuable his carbon offsets become. Also, the more he convinces other people to buy them … such as by touting them as an employee benefit for companies, it increases the demand for them and increases the value of the ones he holds.
Now at some point he is going to be old and feeble and drooling on himself and no longer producing the “carbon footprint” he is now once he sells his mansion and moves into the old folks home … at at that point those carbon offsets are worth a bloody fortune. IF he succeeds. The more people he convinces, the more money he makes on offsets.