<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unheeded Warnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Heading For Trouble</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-59442</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Heading For Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/#comment-59442</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#039;d also point out that these numbers are a disaster for those members of Congress who are running after their party nomination for president in 2008. It is extremely unlikely that the voters are going to reward a member of the current Congress with a promotion. As has been pointed out before - by Democratic party campaign adviser Doug Schoen - the Democratic party has a very, very real danger of bearing a disproportionate share of the blame for the public&#039;s perceptions of Congressional failings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#39;d also point out that these numbers are a disaster for those members of Congress who are running after their party nomination for president in 2008. It is extremely unlikely that the voters are going to reward a member of the current Congress with a promotion. As has been pointed out before &#8211; by Democratic party campaign adviser Doug Schoen &#8211; the Democratic party has a very, very real danger of bearing a disproportionate share of the blame for the public&#39;s perceptions of Congressional failings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-58283</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/#comment-58283</guid>
		<description>Excessive faith in polling is hurting the heck of the Dems, they really do not get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excessive faith in polling is hurting the heck of the Dems, they really do not get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Bowler</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-58282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/#comment-58282</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Poll it again,&quot; Clinton said. But the numbers always came back the same. Americans said they would blame the Republicans if the government was shut down. Congress was being overly aggressive and confrontational. &lt;strong&gt;Standing firm would shore up Clinton&#039;s standing as a strong and principled leader&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;

Isn&#039;t it a hoot that Clinton found strength to stick to his &lt;em&gt;principles&lt;/em&gt; only by taking a poll... several times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Poll it again,&#8221; Clinton said. But the numbers always came back the same. Americans said they would blame the Republicans if the government was shut down. Congress was being overly aggressive and confrontational. <strong>Standing firm would shore up Clinton&#8217;s standing as a strong and principled leader</strong>.</em></p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it a hoot that Clinton found strength to stick to his <em>principles</em> only by taking a poll&#8230; several times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quilly Mammoth</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-58272</link>
		<dc:creator>Quilly Mammoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/04/23/unheeded-warnings/#comment-58272</guid>
		<description>The difference is, of course, that the MSM was on Bill&#039;s side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is, of course, that the MSM was on Bill&#8217;s side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

