Huge Operation
The Associated Press is headlining its latest article on the two whales who swam up the Sacramento River this way: Lost whales at center of huge operation. The article goes on to describe the attempts at rescuing the animals, the critics of the rescue attempts as going about it wrongly and a brief - very brief - mention of people who are questioning why we are interfering at all in this.
RIO VISTA, Calif. - Everyone seems to have a suggestion to get two wayward whales lingering in the Sacramento River to swim 70 miles back to the Pacific Ocean.
One suggested towing life-sized replicas of orcas behind the whales to scare the recalcitrant mother humpback and her calf. Another proposed placing a giant magnet downriver, since humpbacks are thought to navigate by an internal compass that can sense magnetic north.
While rescuers have not tried the hundreds of suggestions they have received via e-mail — most of which are unfeasible — they acknowledge that they are running out of ideas.
"This is very much a work in progress," said Trevor Spradlin, a marine mammal biologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration working at the rescue scene.
Two weeks after the whales were first spotted in fresh water, the giant mammals' behavior remained a mystery, even to scientists.
Biologists hastily drew up plans to spray the whales with fire hoses Friday after nearly a week of pipe-banging and whale recordings failed. Scientists used recordings to nudge a male humpback dubbed Humphrey out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta in 1985.
The pair got stranded after marking an apparent wrong turn earlier this month and heading upstream until they reached the Port of Sacramento and could go no farther. They turned around on their own Sunday, and swam some 20 miles downriver to the Rio Vista Bridge.
The central problem facing scientists trying to engineer new whale-herding techniques is that, while gentle coaxing has proved ineffective, they fear anything too forceful might make the situation worse. Nets pose a threat of entanglement, biologists said.
Any method that induces panic could separate the whales or send them fleeing, increasing the danger they could become stranded in the mud among the delta's labyrinthine network of sloughs, they said.
During the week, rescuers grew concerned that some of the tactics they tried may have been too stressful for the duo. Some onlookers complained that scientists should stop interfering with the whales and allow them to follow their natural instincts.
Look, I have a lot of fun with the whole animal uprising shtick around here, but I suspect most readers realize I genuinely like animals. But we simply cannot rescue every, single misguided animal in the world. Stories like this are a big deal for the media - they can get readers by chronicling the efforts to save the creature in question. But seriously, what is the price tag for something like this kind of effort? How many other worthy projects will be cut or curtailed as a result of an attempt - probably quite futile at this point - to save these two animals. Yes, I know whales are popular in the press and in the imagination of people, but how many others will die as a result of spending all the available funds on these two? The flip side of wanting increased "natural" wildlife is that Mother Nature is, quite frankly, pretty nasty. She kills animals off with abandon at regular intervals - and sometimes at random. If you love the cute, cuddly whales in their natural state, you'll have to accept that cute, cuddly whales sometimes die very nasty deaths in the wild regardless of your delicate sensibilities. And we cannot possibly save every, single one every, single time. It doesn't work that way.





