Driving Short
I cannot remember now where I picked up this term. It may have been in a long-forgotten driver safety film that you were required to watch before getting a license. You know, the "Mechanized Death" or some such film. (If you're younger maybe you never saw any of those "classics".) It may have been later at a driver's safety class (good for reducing one's liability insurance, my company at the time offered those.) But the term stuck with me: "Driving Short". As I remember it, it was a description for a driver focusing their eyes too closely in front of the car. This tended to make the ride very jerky and risked one missing something farther ahead in time to avoid it. We were encouraged to "drive long" or focus farther out in front of the car, to have better control and a better chance of seeing something in time to avoid a problem.
Nancy Pelosi has, yet again, indulged in a classic case of "driving short". Not content with attempting to micromanage the war, she has now engineered citations for "Contempt of Congress" on Executive Branch employees. Ed Morrisey nails why this is a stunningly stupid move on her part:
Tony Snow rather forcefully responded to this development, calling it a singular event in American history, where the legislative branch will direct the executive branch — in the form of the federal prosecutor — to file contempt charges against itself. The Department of Justice reminded Congress that administrations of both parties have long held that Congress has no power to issue contempt citations for claims of executive privilege. Obviously, the current leadership in Congress doesn't care.
It portends a showdown in the Supreme Court over the nature of executive privilege, and Sensenbrenner is correct. Absent any evidence of criminal conduct, the Supreme Court is highly unlikely to grant the legislative branch free rein to pursue contempt charges or to undo executive privilege. Nancy Pelosi will in all likelihood force a ruling that will firmly establish executive privilege and leave Congress with less power than it has had, after having finally called its own bluff.
It's unfortunate that the Democrats chose to pursue this course. Even though I believe that Alberto Gonzales should resign for incompetence, no one has established any criminal conduct at the DoJ, nor are they likely to do so by calling Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten for testimony. It's a fishing expedition in both chambers of Congress.
But Pelosi and company will likely have just gutted themselves in the long run. Just as the short-sighted strategy of trying to dictate the conduct of the war will absolutely come back around to haunt a Democrat in the oval office, so too will this theatrical effort backfire. If, as is almost certain, the Supremes destroy the threat of "Contempt of Congress" on the Executive branch, this will come back to bite the Dems. That great, big wheel turns and things come back around.
Driving short is not a good idea for running a country, any more than it is for driving a car.






