From Rojo Networks' weekly news round-up email, The Week in Rojo:Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) tried to show strength by saying he'd send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists. Sister Toldjah wonders how a position even more aggressive than…

Blue Crab Boulevard offers the most concise take:Let’s see in a week or so we have had Obama say that…

So, let me get this straight. Iraq is an unwinnable quagmire, where the army has been trained by us, and is our ally against terrorists, but we should invade Pakistan, whose army is probably rife with Islamists, and who possesses many nuclear weapons, which would fall into the hands of terrorist enablers if Musharraf was to fall, which he would undoubtedly do in the event of an American invasion.

That's *** brilliant, that is.

(Edit: Language)

Would we attack them if they officially announced they were giving Safe Haven to Al Qaida? I hope so!A good case can be made that they are already doing just that.

I think President Bush should consider attacks on Iran and Pakistan and any country that gives aid and comfort to our enemies. I would even favor ultimatums to the Saudi’s.

We have one worthy and reliable ally in the Muslim world: Israel. Israel is a democracy, it is an open society, it is a place we would feel at home. The Islamic World is a 15th century prison.

I am not a member of the Israel lobby either, I am a Christian. But our foreign policy should make both the USA and Israel more secure and make the Islamists fearful of us.

We must never surrender to Islam and its enablers. I repeat: I would not vote for Obama for Dog Catcher, but those of us who love America should not be afraid to upset the Islamic World. That is what I hear in too much of the meme that has united conservative critics and the dreadful MSM. The MSM is trying to declare that we cannot criticize, much less attack, our Islamic “friends” (and what could Pakistan do to become an enemy?)

A short recon of whatÂ’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often….

Publicly announce an intention to invade an ally with nuclear weapons. That is not naive. You would have to smarten up a lot to make it to naive….

This is my first post in almost three months, but I had to say something about this. Via AP:Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday that he would possibly send troops into Pakistan to hunt down terrorists, an attempt to…

My question is this: why do we tip toe around our Muslim “friends”?

I think it is a good proposal to go after the Islamic terrorists wherever they live. We should separate message from messenger. The throwing Obama off the bus because he isn’t part of the beltway brainwashing is different from rejecting him because he is a liberal.

Getting serious with Pakistan is a good conservative idea.Reject Obama, but don’t use the MSM meme of accomodation to their stranglehold of acceptable ideas to reject him.

Use Crabitat Brand Astroturf Remover®.

Cut and paste comment removed. It was already plastered at just about every blog that allows comments.

Ask this question in a poll: “Do you favor Obama’s proposal of going after terrorists in Pakistan even if it means alienating our Muslim allies?”

My guess is 80% of Americans would say yes. I voted for W because he did something. This action puts Obama to the right of most GOP candidates.

I don’t care about Pakistan or Islam. If it is a fight (and it is) let’s go get them wherever they live. I would love to see W posing over bin Laden’s dead carcass. Let us get all enemies of the USA and let their friends weep over our lack of manners.

And remember, the same voices that will say that Obama is “naieve” are the ones urging us to call off the surge. One’s enemies enemies are NOT one friends.