The New Republic has a real problem on its hands. The MSM is not letting the "Scott Thomas" Beauchamp story die quietly. There are reports on the wire services and in national publications. And the general form of the narrative is that Beauchamp is a fabulist and that TNR was, again, taken to the cleaners by a guy with literary ambitions. Charles Krauthammer weighs in today using words like a scalpel to dissect Beauchamp and his enablers at TNR.
Amid these conflicting claims, one issue is not in dispute. When the New Republic did its initial investigation, it admitted that Beauchamp had erred on one "significant detail." The disfigured-woman incident happened not in Iraq, but in Kuwait.
That means it happened before Beauchamp arrived in Iraq. But the whole point of that story was to demonstrate how the war had turned an otherwise sensitive soul into a monster. Indeed, in the precious, highly self-conscious literary style of an aspiring writer trying out for a New Yorker gig, Beauchamp follows the terrible tale of his cruelty to the disfigured woman by asking, "Am I a monster?" And answering with satisfaction that the very fact that he could ask this question after (the reader has been led to believe) having been so hardened and brutalized by war shows that there is a kernel of humanity left in him.
But, oh, how much was lost. In the past, you see, he was a sensitive soul with "compassion for those with disabilities." In a particularly treacly passage, he tells us that he once worked in a summer camp with disabled children and in college helped a colleague with cerebral palsy. Then this delicate compassionate youth is transformed into an unfeeling animal by war.
Except that it is now revealed that the mess-hall incident happened before he even got to the war. On which point, the whole story — and the whole morality tale it was meant to suggest — collapses.
And it makes the rest of the narrative banal and uninteresting. It's the story of a disgusting human being, a mocker of the disfigured, who then goes to Iraq and, as such human beings are wont to do, finds the company of other such human beings who kill dogs for sport, wear the bones of dead children on their heads and find similar amusement in mocking the disfigured.
Note also that the left is actually very quiet about this story. I have not seen any of the majors on the left even really address this. Could that be because Kos has reason to dislike TNR? Townhouse, anyone?




The New Republic has recently changed its’ lying spots. Formerly TNR preferred reporters like Shallit, Glass, and Ackerman, to spread their lies. Now they
do it with their editor (Foer) who will also be forced to resign.
Schmucks all!