<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apropos Rich&#8217;s Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhymes With Right</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64762</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhymes With Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64762</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Treason At HuffPo!...&lt;/strong&gt;

What else do you call Martin Lewis&#039; direct call for the overthrow of the Constitutional principle of civilian control of the military by having a general relieve the President of his constitutional role of commander-in-chief during time of war? Though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Treason At HuffPo!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What else do you call Martin Lewis&#8217; direct call for the overthrow of the Constitutional principle of civilian control of the military by having a general relieve the President of his constitutional role of commander-in-chief during time of war? Though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pal2pal</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64758</link>
		<dc:creator>Pal2pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64758</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Oh My God! This is Freakin&apos; Unbelievable...&lt;/strong&gt;

Essentially, these freaks want Joints Chief Chairman, General Peter Pace, to arrest the President. HuffPo Calls For Military Coup In USA Ken McCracken writes in response: This is what I wrote to the HuffPo in response: Dear Whomever, Martin Lewis&apos;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oh My God! This is Freakin&apos; Unbelievable&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Essentially, these freaks want Joints Chief Chairman, General Peter Pace, to arrest the President. HuffPo Calls For Military Coup In USA Ken McCracken writes in response: This is what I wrote to the HuffPo in response: Dear Whomever, Martin Lewis&apos;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveinboca</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64757</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinboca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64757</guid>
		<description>I polluted my screen by going to this Lewis dude&#039;s site.  Turns out he is a perfidious Brit who has a bio showing he was publicist for 36 years, but has a photo showing him at 25.  This fraud is a flasher, running across the Diag in his birthday suit, as they did back in Ann Arbor.  Needs the attention or he&#039;ll shrivel like a tranny of the WWoftheWest in Dorothy-land. 

Of course this is treason, but since when did that stop the Democrats from formulating their agendas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I polluted my screen by going to this Lewis dude&#8217;s site.  Turns out he is a perfidious Brit who has a bio showing he was publicist for 36 years, but has a photo showing him at 25.  This fraud is a flasher, running across the Diag in his birthday suit, as they did back in Ann Arbor.  Needs the attention or he&#8217;ll shrivel like a tranny of the WWoftheWest in Dorothy-land. </p>
<p>Of course this is treason, but since when did that stop the Democrats from formulating their agendas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huffington Post Idoit Calls For Military Coup In America</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64756</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huffington Post Idoit Calls For Military Coup In America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64756</guid>
		<description>[...] Also see: Hot Air Blue Crab Boulevard       &#160;[Print This Post]&#160; [permalink]&#160;[Trackback URI] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also see: Hot Air Blue Crab Boulevard       &nbsp;[Print This Post]&nbsp; [permalink]&nbsp;[Trackback URI] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64754</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64754</guid>
		<description>I would be surprised if calls for a military coup stay confined to the kook fringe of the Left (O.K. - that is redundant, I know). Example: 9-11 &quot;Trutherism&quot; is slowly going mainstream. 

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/09/video-john-edwards-appeases-a-9-11-wtc-building-7-truther-promises-to-look-into-what-happened/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How about John Edwards promising to look into the charges surrounding 9-11?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/24/finally-i-am-increasingly-troubled-at-the-inconsistencies-in-the-official-narrative-of-911/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How about Robert &quot;I am not a conspiracy theorist but...&quot; Fisk?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Furthermore, the crackpot notion that Bush stole both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections is by now Inerrant Holy Scripture among the Nutroots, so why should the save-democracy-by-military-coup insanity not gain traction as well? Remember â€“ the kooks truly believe that they are the mainstream!

Gaius, you may remember Gary Sick and his &quot;October surprise&quot; conspiracy theory. He was the ex-Carter administration official who claimed that in 1980 &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danielpipes.org/article/1048&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Reagan-Bush campaign conspired with the Iranian government to keep the American hostages and bring about Carter&#039;s defeat.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; That one (in the pre-Internet days) was kicked around for over a decade. No telling the shelf life of this latest round of Far Left conspiracy theory lunacy and â€œdemocraticâ€ solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be surprised if calls for a military coup stay confined to the kook fringe of the Left (O.K. &#8211; that is redundant, I know). Example: 9-11 &#8220;Trutherism&#8221; is slowly going mainstream. </p>
<p><b><a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/09/video-john-edwards-appeases-a-9-11-wtc-building-7-truther-promises-to-look-into-what-happened/" rel="nofollow">How about John Edwards promising to look into the charges surrounding 9-11?</a></b></p>
<p><b><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/08/24/finally-i-am-increasingly-troubled-at-the-inconsistencies-in-the-official-narrative-of-911/" rel="nofollow">How about Robert &#8220;I am not a conspiracy theorist but&#8230;&#8221; Fisk?</a></b></p>
<p>Furthermore, the crackpot notion that Bush stole both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections is by now Inerrant Holy Scripture among the Nutroots, so why should the save-democracy-by-military-coup insanity not gain traction as well? Remember â€“ the kooks truly believe that they are the mainstream!</p>
<p>Gaius, you may remember Gary Sick and his &#8220;October surprise&#8221; conspiracy theory. He was the ex-Carter administration official who claimed that in 1980 <b><a href="http://www.danielpipes.org/article/1048" rel="nofollow">the Reagan-Bush campaign conspired with the Iranian government to keep the American hostages and bring about Carter&#8217;s defeat.</a></b> That one (in the pre-Internet days) was kicked around for over a decade. No telling the shelf life of this latest round of Far Left conspiracy theory lunacy and â€œdemocraticâ€ solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64753</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64753</guid>
		<description>Oh Heck. Guess I better cancel the souvenir Club Fed party glasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Heck. Guess I better cancel the souvenir Club Fed party glasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleepless</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64752</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleepless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64752</guid>
		<description>The only problem is, that statute is the Smith Act.  The Warren court decided, in about l961, that advocacy is protected.  All that is outlawed is incitement.  &quot;As long as there is time for speech to rebut speech&quot; the First Amendment applies.  I do wonder what the present court would decide but, until they change it, we are stuck with one more of the Earl of Warren&#039;s commandments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem is, that statute is the Smith Act.  The Warren court decided, in about l961, that advocacy is protected.  All that is outlawed is incitement.  &#8220;As long as there is time for speech to rebut speech&#8221; the First Amendment applies.  I do wonder what the present court would decide but, until they change it, we are stuck with one more of the Earl of Warren&#8217;s commandments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64751</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HuffPo calls for military coup, wants General Pace to arrest President...&lt;/strong&gt;

Read this letter.  All of it.  Addressed from Martin Lewis at the HuffPo to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Peter Pace, begging him to &#8220;arrest&#8221; the President on charges of &#8220;conduct unbecoming.
At the same time I was read...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HuffPo calls for military coup, wants General Pace to arrest President&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Read this letter.  All of it.  Addressed from Martin Lewis at the HuffPo to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Peter Pace, begging him to &#8220;arrest&#8221; the President on charges of &#8220;conduct unbecoming.<br />
At the same time I was read&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64750</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64750</guid>
		<description>Well, you could photoshop their logo......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you could photoshop their logo&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64749</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64749</guid>
		<description>Dammit!  Dammit!  Dammit!  

I KNEW there was a reason I should have had the HuffPo in my blogroll.

Is it too late to add them so I can unceremoniously remove them later tonight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit!  Dammit!  Dammit!  </p>
<p>I KNEW there was a reason I should have had the HuffPo in my blogroll.</p>
<p>Is it too late to add them so I can unceremoniously remove them later tonight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64748</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64748</guid>
		<description>HuffPo has a real problem here. Let&#039;s see if they are smart enough to can this guy publicly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HuffPo has a real problem here. Let&#8217;s see if they are smart enough to can this guy publicly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanette</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/comment-page-1/#comment-64747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/08/25/apropos-richs-post/#comment-64747</guid>
		<description>At our blog we try to point out views from both sides of the political spectrum, sometimes having some big arguments and then staying friends.

Our one liberal blogger sometimes quotes from HuffPo and I have just posted that from now on any links to that blog will have the entire post removed as soon as I see it.

They have also been removed from our Liberal Reads Blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At our blog we try to point out views from both sides of the political spectrum, sometimes having some big arguments and then staying friends.</p>
<p>Our one liberal blogger sometimes quotes from HuffPo and I have just posted that from now on any links to that blog will have the entire post removed as soon as I see it.</p>
<p>They have also been removed from our Liberal Reads Blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

