And I mean that sincerely. I knew that the Norman Hsu story was too big and smelly for the media to ignore, but I did not expect the New York Times to get out in front of it like this. They have a big article on it – and it is getting uncomfortable to be a Democrat who took money from Hsu – or anyone involved with him. Because it is looking like Hsu (or his company) paid large amounts of money to others – who then contributed heavily to Democrats. It looks very much like there may be felonies involved here.
The records show that Components Ltd., a company controlled by Mr. Hsu that has no obvious business purpose and appears to exist only on paper, has paid a total of more than $100,000 to at least nine people who made campaign contributions to Mrs. Clinton and others through Mr. Hsu. The payments occurred in the spring of 2003, several months before Mr. Hsu emerged as a contributor to Democrats and more than a year before he started bundling checks from those same people for various campaigns. In all, he has raised more than $1 million for Democrats.
The records make clear that the group was more than just a loose collection of friends, family and co-workers that bundlers typically rely on when raising money for a candidate. Rather, each person had a direct financial relationship with Mr. Hsu, either receiving money from his company or paying into it, even though many of them appear to have other jobs or businesses independent of him. The purpose of the payments, and whether they related to business costs, fees or expenses, is unclear……..
……..The financial records for Components Ltd. show that Mr. Su’s wife, Lelawattie Su, wired $100,000 to the company in May 2003, and that Mr. Hsu used that money to wire $109,500 the next day to a woman in California. On another occasion, Mr. Paw wired $20,000 to Components Ltd., and Mr. Hsu immediately wired $30,000 to another company whose location could not be determined.
In roughly that same period, Components Ltd. issued three checks to Mr. Paw totaling about $16,000, and checks and wire transfers totaling more than $100,000 to eight other people, including a worker at a rehabilitation center for the handicapped, a housewife, a nurse, a real estate developer, a plastics company executive and his wife, and a clothing shop manager.
Mr. Hsu later bundled campaign contributions from all of those people, including Mr. Paw and six members of his family, along with Mr. and Mrs. Su. The Paws and Sus together contributed more than $400,000 since 2004 to Democrats across the country, usually in tandem with Mr. Hsu.
Wow, this story just went vertical. This is going to get very ugly indeed with the NYT even jumping in – and digging out even worse dirt. Someone – a lot of someones, actually – have some explaining to do. I'm sure the ones asking the questions will have badges.




Something smells about the NYT jumping in when it can’t help the folks they shill for.
Follow the money.
Which candidate benefits the most from this?
Answer: Barak Obama. He is more of the sort of anti-war type that Pinchy supports.
I agree with Quilly Mammoth and Uncle Fester. The notion that the New York Times has had a sudden, uncontrollable attack of honesty is rather far-fetched, particularly when you consider how they continue to flack for al Qaeda. Barak “The Audacity of an Empty Suit” Obama seems the likely beneficiary of all of this.
Pingback: Blue Crab Boulevard » Bundles Of Cash