<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary And Hsu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/09/26/hillary-and-hsu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/09/26/hillary-and-hsu/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Pinky</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/09/26/hillary-and-hsu/comment-page-1/#comment-67510</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Pinky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/09/26/hillary-and-hsu/#comment-67510</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t help but think that Hillary!&#039;s non-response on this is telling.  Shouldn&#039;t a wise politico try to quash this?  Judging by the MSM response it&#039;s a non-event, so  why not have Hillary! get in front of the story?

What with the GQ quashing being bruited about and the lingering embarrassment of Eason Jordan&#039;s admission that journalistic enterprise can be bought off, shouldn&#039;t the press be digging hard?  Asking questions?

Kind of looks like, for the most part, they&#039;re in the tank.  Say it ain&#039;t so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t help but think that Hillary!&#8217;s non-response on this is telling.  Shouldn&#8217;t a wise politico try to quash this?  Judging by the MSM response it&#8217;s a non-event, so  why not have Hillary! get in front of the story?</p>
<p>What with the GQ quashing being bruited about and the lingering embarrassment of Eason Jordan&#8217;s admission that journalistic enterprise can be bought off, shouldn&#8217;t the press be digging hard?  Asking questions?</p>
<p>Kind of looks like, for the most part, they&#8217;re in the tank.  Say it ain&#8217;t so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

