<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Dirty Is Hillary&#8217;s Money?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Securing The Dishwasher Vote</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-70077</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Securing The Dishwasher Vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-70077</guid>
		<description>[...] LA Times article that kicked this off cites some donors being strongarmed into contributing by neighborhood bosses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LA Times article that kicked this off cites some donors being strongarmed into contributing by neighborhood bosses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where&#8217;s the money coming from? &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69979</link>
		<dc:creator>Where&#8217;s the money coming from? &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69979</guid>
		<description>[...] Pontifications, michellemalkin.com, Flopping Aces, , Blogs for Bush, Captain&#8217;s Quarters,   Blue Crab Boulevard, Riehl World View, Spin Cycle, Wizbang, QandO, JammieWearingFool, Suitably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pontifications, michellemalkin.com, Flopping Aces, , Blogs for Bush, Captain&#8217;s Quarters,   Blue Crab Boulevard, Riehl World View, Spin Cycle, Wizbang, QandO, JammieWearingFool, Suitably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69970</guid>
		<description>Ya know - I am soooooooooooooo glad that McCain-Feingold got rid of big money in politics. We lost a large chunk of the Constitution, but it was worth it.

It is good for democracy that a big money doner - let us hypothetically say Johnny Hsu - can no longer funnel large amounts of dirty money to a candidate - let us hypothetically say Hillary Clinton. Thank goodness something like this can never happen again! If it did, such an action would cause the media - our even-handed, non-partisan media - to expose the wrongdoers 24/7 until justice was done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know &#8211; I am soooooooooooooo glad that McCain-Feingold got rid of big money in politics. We lost a large chunk of the Constitution, but it was worth it.</p>
<p>It is good for democracy that a big money doner &#8211; let us hypothetically say Johnny Hsu &#8211; can no longer funnel large amounts of dirty money to a candidate &#8211; let us hypothetically say Hillary Clinton. Thank goodness something like this can never happen again! If it did, such an action would cause the media &#8211; our even-handed, non-partisan media &#8211; to expose the wrongdoers 24/7 until justice was done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Jon</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69959</link>
		<dc:creator>_Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69959</guid>
		<description>I am considering another angle here.
How did these donations occur? 
- Cash?
- Certified check?
- Personal check?

If it is personal check, then that has to be traceable via a checking account.
That would be an interesting excursion.

Who does fund raisers where people bring thousands of dollars in cash?

I would be interesting to learn how the money at a fund raiser is actually transferred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am considering another angle here.<br />
How did these donations occur?<br />
- Cash?<br />
- Certified check?<br />
- Personal check?</p>
<p>If it is personal check, then that has to be traceable via a checking account.<br />
That would be an interesting excursion.</p>
<p>Who does fund raisers where people bring thousands of dollars in cash?</p>
<p>I would be interesting to learn how the money at a fund raiser is actually transferred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icepick</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69950</link>
		<dc:creator>Icepick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69950</guid>
		<description>The Clintons AREN&#039;T Obama, Dean, etc. Danged typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clintons AREN&#8217;T Obama, Dean, etc. Danged typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icepick</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69949</link>
		<dc:creator>Icepick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69949</guid>
		<description>CA wrote: &lt;i&gt;Obama, Dean and others have demonstrated that you can raise considerable campaign cash without having to rely on shady operators.&lt;/i&gt;

But the Clintons are Obama, Dean or the others. The Clintons haven&#039;t demostrated that THEY can raise this kind of cash without these shady operators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA wrote: <i>Obama, Dean and others have demonstrated that you can raise considerable campaign cash without having to rely on shady operators.</i></p>
<p>But the Clintons are Obama, Dean or the others. The Clintons haven&#8217;t demostrated that THEY can raise this kind of cash without these shady operators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icepick</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69948</link>
		<dc:creator>Icepick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69948</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see where this is a blockbuster. It&#039;s not like we haven&#039;t known that the Clintons were less than squeeky clean. But this does have to be infuriating to Obama. Being able to raise more money than Hillary was not only helpful to his campaign, but also showed that he DID have more grassroots support. Then Hil went out and out-fund-raised him last quarter. To know it was done on the sly like this has to be galling. (I imagine Edwaards would be pretty put out by this, too.)

What I really want to see is for someone to ask McCain how he thinks McCain-Feingold is working out in the real world.

....

WILD SPECULATION SECTION

Suppose that Hillary manages to blast through the first few primaries and such, fatally wounding the campaigns of Obama and Edwards,  but in the process those two raise such a stink that this finally becomes a scandal to bring the Clintons low. The Democratic Party may need a savior at that point. But with O &amp; E already looking raggedy, the party won&#039;t be able to turn to them. But waiting off-stage is Al Gore. I really think Al would love to be the nominee again, I just don&#039;t think he wants to go through the hell of the nomination process. This could be how he finally gets another shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see where this is a blockbuster. It&#8217;s not like we haven&#8217;t known that the Clintons were less than squeeky clean. But this does have to be infuriating to Obama. Being able to raise more money than Hillary was not only helpful to his campaign, but also showed that he DID have more grassroots support. Then Hil went out and out-fund-raised him last quarter. To know it was done on the sly like this has to be galling. (I imagine Edwaards would be pretty put out by this, too.)</p>
<p>What I really want to see is for someone to ask McCain how he thinks McCain-Feingold is working out in the real world.</p>
<p>&#8230;.</p>
<p>WILD SPECULATION SECTION</p>
<p>Suppose that Hillary manages to blast through the first few primaries and such, fatally wounding the campaigns of Obama and Edwards,  but in the process those two raise such a stink that this finally becomes a scandal to bring the Clintons low. The Democratic Party may need a savior at that point. But with O &amp; E already looking raggedy, the party won&#8217;t be able to turn to them. But waiting off-stage is Al Gore. I really think Al would love to be the nominee again, I just don&#8217;t think he wants to go through the hell of the nomination process. This could be how he finally gets another shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Andersen</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69946</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69946</guid>
		<description>It certainly looks like some of these organizations may be shaking down their members. But there is, as of yet, no evidence that Clinton herself is a knowing participant in these shakedowns.

Still, this kind of thing is distasteful, counter-productive and unnecessary. Obama, Dean and others have demonstrated that you can raise considerable campaign cash without having to rely on shady operators. I wish more politicians would figure this out. Maybe then our system wouldn&#039;t be so corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly looks like some of these organizations may be shaking down their members. But there is, as of yet, no evidence that Clinton herself is a knowing participant in these shakedowns.</p>
<p>Still, this kind of thing is distasteful, counter-productive and unnecessary. Obama, Dean and others have demonstrated that you can raise considerable campaign cash without having to rely on shady operators. I wish more politicians would figure this out. Maybe then our system wouldn&#8217;t be so corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feeblemind</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/comment-page-1/#comment-69945</link>
		<dc:creator>feeblemind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/10/19/how-dirty-is-hillarys-money/#comment-69945</guid>
		<description>The American Spectator had a good piece on this as well.  The point of AS piece was that the Clintons have done this since they were in the Governor&#039;s Mansion.  If you never get caught or punished by the voters for it, why change tactics? The law does not apply to the Clintons. It gives them a huge advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Spectator had a good piece on this as well.  The point of AS piece was that the Clintons have done this since they were in the Governor&#8217;s Mansion.  If you never get caught or punished by the voters for it, why change tactics? The law does not apply to the Clintons. It gives them a huge advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

