The Real Agenda Of Global Warming
All the sound and fury, all the relentless barrage of media hype, all of the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the true believers and sycophants of Al Gore about global warming have been orchestrated for a specific purpose. That purpose was out in the open, in all its global socialistic majesty in the luxurious setting of the UN conference on global warming in Bali.
It is about global taxation, with the United Nations as the recipient of the massive windfall of money taken from the “rich” nations. Nothing more elaborate than that.
BALI, Indonesia – A global tax on carbon dioxide emissions was urged to help save the Earth from catastrophic man-made global warming at the United Nations climate conference. A panel of UN participants on Thursday urged the adoption of a tax that would represent “a global burden sharing system, fair, with solidarity, and legally binding to all nations.”
“Finally someone will pay for these [climate related] costs,” Othmar Schwank, a global tax advocate, told Inhofe EPW Press Blog following the panel discussion titled “A Global CO2 Tax.” Schwank is a consultant with the Switzerland based Mauch Consulting firm
Schwank said at least “$10-$40 billion dollars per year” could be generated by the tax, and wealthy nations like the U.S. would bear the biggest burden based on the “polluters pay principle.”
The U.S. and other wealthy nations need to “contribute significantly more to this global fund,” Schwank explained. He also added, “It is very essential to tax coal.”
The UN was presented with a new report from the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment titled “Global Solidarity in Financing Adaptation.” The report stated there was an “urgent need” for a global tax in order for “damages [from climate change] to be kept from growing to truly catastrophic levels, especially in vulnerable countries of the developing world.”
The tens of billions of dollars per year generated by a global tax would “flow into a global Multilateral Adaptation Fund” to help nations cope with global warming, according to the report.
Schwank said a global carbon dioxide tax is an idea long overdue that is urgently needed to establish “a funding scheme which generates the resources required to address the dimension of challenge with regard to climate change costs.”
'Diminish future prosperity'
However, ideas like a global tax and the overall UN climate agenda met strong opposition Thursday from a team of over 100 prominent international scientists who warned the UN that attempting to control the Earth's climate was "ultimately futile."
The scientists wrote, “The IPCC's conclusions are quite inadequate as justification for implementing policies that will markedly diminish future prosperity. In particular, it is not established that it is possible to significantly alter global climate through cuts in human greenhouse gas emissions." The scientists, many of whom are current or former members of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), sent the December 13 letter to the UN Secretary-General. (See: Over 100 Prominent Scientists Warn UN Against 'Futile' Climate Control Efforts – LINK)
Well, let me rephrase the opening to this post. There actually is a more elaborate agenda. Once they have exerted taxation that is "legally binding to all nations," how long will it be until they decide to exert power over other aspects of a nation's sovereignty?
I'd say about the Tuesday after the Monday their scheme goes into effect. If they wait that long.
Energy, Environment, Junk Science, World news | Gaius Friday, 14 December , 2007
By David M, Friday, 14 December , 2007 @ 10:32 am
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 12/14/2007 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.
By Rich Horton, Friday, 14 December , 2007 @ 11:04 am
Maybe Gore will have to “disappear” these scientists…after all he already said they didn’t exist.
By Mockin'bird, Friday, 14 December , 2007 @ 1:49 pm
“What a field day for the Elite.”
By martian, Friday, 14 December , 2007 @ 3:01 pm
The tens of billions of dollars per year generated by a global tax would “flow into a global Multilateral Adaptation Fund” to help nations cope with global warming, according to the report.
Can you say Iraqi Oil for Food Program on a global scale? The UN couldn’t even administer a financial program that was limited to a single nation without ending up with massive corruption both inside the program administration and outside with vendors. And these idiots want to turn over “$10-$40 billion dollars per year” to those people? How crazy are they?
By ted goldman, Saturday, 15 December , 2007 @ 11:23 am
“The power to tax is the power to destroy”
American politicians screw us up enough, than you.
By ted goldman, Saturday, 15 December , 2007 @ 11:25 am
“The power to tax is the power to destroy”.
American politicians are bad enough, thank you.