<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Reid&#8217;s Unconstitutional Expansion Of Congressional Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martian</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/comment-page-1/#comment-73012</link>
		<dc:creator>martian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/#comment-73012</guid>
		<description>This is just another case of Democrats&#039; &quot;tunnel vision&quot; when it comes to Pres. Bush. They are so fixated on trying to block any action he might take and on damaging him in any way they can that they are incapable of seeing what the backlash might be on themselves in the future. This is not the first time they have done this and, with their obssesive/compulsiveness when it comes to Pres. Bush, it won&#039;t be the last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just another case of Democrats&#8217; &#8220;tunnel vision&#8221; when it comes to Pres. Bush. They are so fixated on trying to block any action he might take and on damaging him in any way they can that they are incapable of seeing what the backlash might be on themselves in the future. This is not the first time they have done this and, with their obssesive/compulsiveness when it comes to Pres. Bush, it won&#8217;t be the last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FedUp</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/comment-page-1/#comment-72975</link>
		<dc:creator>FedUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/#comment-72975</guid>
		<description>What goes around...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What goes around&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony (Los Angeles)</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/comment-page-1/#comment-72964</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony (Los Angeles)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 04:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/#comment-72964</guid>
		<description>And here I thought the Republicans in Clinton&#039;s time were petty. Reid and his party take it to a whole new (low) level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought the Republicans in Clinton&#8217;s time were petty. Reid and his party take it to a whole new (low) level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeM</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/comment-page-1/#comment-72954</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2007/12/24/harry-reids-unconstitutional-expansion-of-congressional-power/#comment-72954</guid>
		<description>If the Senate would actually hold hearings on nominees, they wouldn&#039;t be in the position of having to resort to such games. It&#039;s their own fault that they have to guard against recess appointments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Senate would actually hold hearings on nominees, they wouldn&#8217;t be in the position of having to resort to such games. It&#8217;s their own fault that they have to guard against recess appointments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

