<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s I Told You So</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76273</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76273</guid>
		<description>No, Oolius. Unless the generation is reliable, distributing it does not help the situation. If the power source is fickle - dependent on the wind or the sun - it has to be backed up by a reliable source. Those backups have to be up and running - they cannot come on line fast enough (that spinning reserve that Sam mentions.). There are likely several generating stations down for maintenance at this time of year - which is generally not a time of peak demands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is my field, Oolius. This is what I do, power engineering. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Side note to Sam. Most coal stations can (and do) load-follow. Nuclear stations are base load. The early GE BWRs were originally planned as load followers, but the NRC had an issue&#160; with non-licensed load dispatchers controlling them. (A position I agree with.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Oolius. Unless the generation is reliable, distributing it does not help the situation. If the power source is fickle &#8211; dependent on the wind or the sun &#8211; it has to be backed up by a reliable source. Those backups have to be up and running &#8211; they cannot come on line fast enough (that spinning reserve that Sam mentions.). There are likely several generating stations down for maintenance at this time of year &#8211; which is generally not a time of peak demands. </p>
<p>This is my field, Oolius. This is what I do, power engineering. </p>
<p>Side note to Sam. Most coal stations can (and do) load-follow. Nuclear stations are base load. The early GE BWRs were originally planned as load followers, but the NRC had an issue&nbsp; with non-licensed load dispatchers controlling them. (A position I agree with.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Oolius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76268</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Oolius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76268</guid>
		<description>The point was that it&#039;s rather silly to suggest that &lt;em&gt;wind&lt;/em&gt; is fickle, when on that day the [lack of] wind-related outage affected virtually no one yet the outage involving [though tangentially] traditional power plants affected millions.&#160; That having been said, our grid needs some work.&#160; I&#039;d probably go more for additional distributed generation capacity, you&#039;d probably go more for additional lines, we&#039;ll split the difference and come out ahead.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point was that it&#8217;s rather silly to suggest that <em>wind</em> is fickle, when on that day the [lack of] wind-related outage affected virtually no one yet the outage involving [though tangentially] traditional power plants affected millions.&nbsp; That having been said, our grid needs some work.&nbsp; I&#8217;d probably go more for additional distributed generation capacity, you&#8217;d probably go more for additional lines, we&#8217;ll split the difference and come out ahead.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76261</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76261</guid>
		<description>Sounds like they didn&#039;t have enough spinning reserves on line to handle the loss of wind generation.&#160; Coal and nuclear generation can&#039;t ramp fast enough to follow short term load fluctuations, you need gas fired generation (CT or CC) and hydro to do that.&#160; I don&#039;t know about gas units, but there isn&#039;t much Hydro in the ERCOT region.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like they didn&#8217;t have enough spinning reserves on line to handle the loss of wind generation.&nbsp; Coal and nuclear generation can&#8217;t ramp fast enough to follow short term load fluctuations, you need gas fired generation (CT or CC) and hydro to do that.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t know about gas units, but there isn&#8217;t much Hydro in the ERCOT region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76255</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76255</guid>
		<description>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - &lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/02/web-reconnaissance-for-02292008.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/02/web-reconnaissance-for-02292008.html&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&gt; Web Reconnaissance for 02/29/2008 &lt;/a&gt; A short recon of what&#8217;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the &#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/02/web-reconnaissance-for-02292008.html" rel="nofollow">http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2008/02/web-reconnaissance-for-02292008.html</a>&quot;&gt; Web Reconnaissance for 02/29/2008 &lt;/a&gt; A short recon of what&rsquo;s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;so check back often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76233</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76233</guid>
		<description>They did not have sufficient fossil/nuclear generation or they would not have load shed. And you&#039;ve got the cart before the horse on Florida. A grid disturbance caused the generating facilities to trip off. This is meant to protect the generation and is planned and engineered into the systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did not have sufficient fossil/nuclear generation or they would not have load shed. And you&#8217;ve got the cart before the horse on Florida. A grid disturbance caused the generating facilities to trip off. This is meant to protect the generation and is planned and engineered into the systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Oolius</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/comment-page-1/#comment-76231</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Oolius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/02/29/todays-i-told-you-so/#comment-76231</guid>
		<description>Traditional sources were also incapable of providing power during the peak surge Tuesday--it&#039;s not like they don&#039;t have coal fired plants in Texas!&#160; Speaking of Tuesday: that&#039;s the very same day 3 million customers lost power in Florida because traditional sources of nuclear, nat. gas, and coal had a hickup.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional sources were also incapable of providing power during the peak surge Tuesday&#8211;it&#8217;s not like they don&#8217;t have coal fired plants in Texas!&nbsp; Speaking of Tuesday: that&#8217;s the very same day 3 million customers lost power in Florida because traditional sources of nuclear, nat. gas, and coal had a hickup.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

