The Vicious Left

Ed Morrisey links to this video, originating from the leftwing site MyDD using some of the most awful video from 9/11, bashing heck out of Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama and generally playing attack dog in the Democratic nomination process. The excuse for this vicious attack is that the Republicans will supposedly use this to get Obama. Now, of course, they don't have to. Oddly, the video makes John McCain look positively wonderful. I don't think that is quite what "Universal" at MyDD was aiming for, but he or she sure did.

As Ed puts it:

Of course, the fact that even George Bush didn’t use 9/11 footage in an attack ad against John Kerry doesn’t enter into Universal’s argument. Would John McCain be likely to do so? Not at all, and he’s not likely to use the Wright footage, either. He hasn’t even commented on the Wright Stuff, and his campaign suspended a member who Twittered one of the videos to his contacts.

The “GOP will use it” argument simply serves as a dodge for an attack on Obama over the Wright Stuff. Universal wants Obama out of the race, and has served up some fear mongering to suit that purpose.

I have a feeling this over-the-top video will be disappeared before very long. So I've saved it for future reference. The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy will eventually have to answer for what they are doing right now. It is interesting to see the left savage one another right now. In a gory, trainwreck, can't look away sort of way. 

Arms Race

My wife and I went out for a while today and decided to stop at a sporting goods store. I had wanted to take a look at a handgun but declined to buy it when the store did not carry extra magazines for the gun and also wanted to charge an exorbitant fee to transfer it to the state I reside in. Some bargains are simply not worth it. While browsing further, we looked at one of these:

But my wife told me we didn't need it, so I didn't buy it. I wandered off for a while looking around at other things when my cell phone started ringing. My youngest boy (who was with us) called and said that Mommy was buying the SU-16 for herself.

Now I know why she wouldn't let me buy it. 

Mookie Beats Feet

The Associated Press refrains from Calling Moqtada al Sadr - Mookie - by their usual descriptive term: "Fiery" in this report. Maybe because winners don't do what Mookie is doing: pulling his fighters off the streets nationwide in Iraq.

Al-Sadr's nine-point statement was issued by his headquarters in the holy city of Najaf and broadcast through loudspeakers on Shiite mosques. It said the first point was: "taking gunmen off the streets in Basra and elsewhere."

He also demanded that the Iraqi government stop "haphazard raids" and release security detainees who haven't been charged, two issues cited by his movement as reasons for fighting the government.

Followers handed out sweets in Baghdad's main Mahdi Army militia stronghold of Sadr City.

Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh called the statement "positive and responsible." But he also warned in a telephone interview broadcast on Iraqi state TV. that security forces would continue to target those who don't follow the order.

"We expect a wide response to this call," he said. "After this announcement, anybody who targets the government and its institutions will be regarded … as outlaws."

It would appear that Mookie has, once again, been defeated. If he was actually winning, he would not have run for cover. One presumes that the new tactic of hitting Mahdi Army headquarters and strongholds got Mookie's attention. Since, presumably, he is smart enough to realize that his stronghold could be next. The media - and the left - have been trying to sell this latest wet firecracker from al Sadr as a sign that the Iraqi government has lost control. It looks rather more like al Sadr has lost decisively. 

You There! Step Away From The Root Beer!

I don't know which part is sillier. A police department raiding a root beer "kegger" and making more than 90 kids take Breathalyzer tests to prove they had been drinking the soft drink or the excuses by the police department when they had to admit that they had done so.

Dustin Zebro, 18, said he staged the party after friends at D.C. Everest High School got suspended from sports because of pictures showing them drinking from red cups.

The root-beer kegger was "to kind of make fun of the school," he said. "They assumed there was beer in the cups. We just wanted to have some root beer in red cups and just make it look like a party, but there actually wasn't any alcohol."…..

……"It was a tremendous waste of time and manpower, but we still had a job to do, and our officers did it," (police chief Daniel)Joling said. "If one kid had come there, even hadn't drank there, but had come there and had been drinking and had left and crashed and burned, then what would the sentiment be? Why didn't the police check everybody out?"

Admittedly, the police had cause to respond to a complaint about cars blocking the road, but it seems a bit of a reach to begin breath testing the people involved since, presumably, the police can tell the difference between root beer and beer. One look at the keg should have simply put the matter to rest. The police appear to have been more than a bit overzealous in this case. I'm also wondering what actual authority the police had to demand breath tests given the situation. Want to bet there is a lawsuit (or a number of them) coming over this? 

The Appeaser

Michael Goodwin sees a genuine disaster for Barack Obama in the Reverend Jeremiah Wright fiasco. He also sees the reason why it is such a disaster. Instead of Obama's claims to being a uniter, Goodwin sees Obama's stance on Wright's anti-America vitriol as nothing more than appeasement. Call Obama the Neville Chamberlain of our time.

Consider, for example, that Obama, alone among all major candidates this year, said he would meet our enemies without conditions, including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. If his approach to Wright were applied, Obama would emerge from that meeting by condemning Ahmadinejad's threat to wipe Israel off the map while also condemning American and Israeli policies. This moral equivalency would be tacit support for Iran's warped grievances, and perhaps for its nuclear program.

After all, we have nuclear weapons and so does Israel, so who are we to deny Iran? Or, as Obama put it Friday when talking about race relations, "People all want the same thing."

They don't, but appeasement thinking often credits everybody with equally good and worthy intentions. That was the mistake of the most infamous appeaser of modern times, Neville Chamberlain, the British prime minister who, with France's help, gave in to Adolf Hitler in hopes of heading off war. In exchange for sacrificing innocent Czechs and others living on lands Hitler wanted, Chamberlain famously waved a treaty with Hitler's name on it that he insisted would secure "peace for our time."

Within days, Herr Hitler, as Chamberlain called him, attacked his neighbors and within a year Europe was engulfed in World War II.

Would Obama be so naive or craven? Because of his limited experience, we don't know. That's why the Wright episode, the most difficult issue of his idealistic campaign, takes on huge importance. The lessons are not pretty.  

There simply is no amount of context that can offset Wright's viciousness. Regardless of how much else Wright may have done, he crossed a line when he shouted out "God Damn America." Obama's lukewarm denunciations of that and other outrageous statements by Wright speak volumes about Obama. None of it good. A president must not indulge in moral equivalence, a president must lead. Obama simply appeased. That is what will come back to haunt him in the coming months.  

The Big Not-So-Easy

If one nickname for New Orleans is The Big Easy, one could reasonably apply the term The Big Not-So-Easy to the long-overdue cleanup of the filthy bayou of Louisiana politics. Yet the new governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal, has managed to make some very impressive progress on draining that swamp. He has also managed to arrange for much-needed repairs to Louisiana's broken-down infrastructure.

Less than a month after taking office Mr. Jindal called a special legislative session to push an ambitious package of reforms aimed at transforming the state's image as an ethical cesspool. Though he encountered some minor resistance, Mr. Jindal managed to pass most of what he wanted, including broad financial disclosure requirements for state legislators and public officials, bans on awarding state contracts to politicians and their family members, and tight restrictions on meals, tickets and other legalized graft used by lobbyists to ply compliant lawmakers.

Some pills, however, proved too bitter for legislators to swallow. A bill that would have stripped those convicted of public corruption of their state pensions went down to defeat.

No sooner had the first special session wrapped up than Mr. Jindal announced plans for a second – this one focused on state finances. Contrary to common perception, the years after Hurricane Katrina have been pretty good ones for Louisiana's bank account. The flood of reconstruction money and soaring revenues from oil and gas production have left state coffers bulging. Outgoing Gov. Kathleen Blanco, widely reviled for her administration's bungling of the post-Katrina rebuilding effort – left Mr. Jindal a $1.1 billion budget surplus.

Though he ran as a fiscal conservative, Mr. Jindal saw the one-time surplus as a chance to pump cash into the state's dilapidated infrastructure. To that end, in a manic one-week spending spree, Mr. Jindal doled out $300 million to help fortify crumbling levees and rebuild eroding barrier islands. He allocated more than $500 million to repair the state's roads, bridges, ports and schools. He even found tens-of-millions to seed a biomedical research facility and pay down the state's looming pension obligations.

All this has been accomplished during special sessions of the legislature, where Jindal had broad control over the agenda. He will have much less say in the regular session, but he still has a mandate from the voters to clean things up. What he has accomplished to date is a very good start. Legislators would be wise to heed the popularity of what Jindal has done so far and not try to undo it. As the author of the Wall Street Journal op-ed, Douglas McCollam notes, Jindal appears to be in the right place at the right time to really make lasting, positive changes in Louisiana politics. 

Smoke-Filled Gore

The Telegraph reports that aides to Al Gore are busily floating a trial balloon of a potential smoke-filled room "compromise" that would give the Democratic presidential nomination to none other than Al Gore.

The opening has emerged because opinion polls show Mr McCain stretching his lead over both Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton, whose campaigns are engaged in a daily cycle of attacks, character assassination and mutual recriminations on religion, race and the economy.

Between a quarter and a third of Obama and Clinton supporters say that they would not now vote for the other in November.

The prospect of a new Gore candidacy was raised last week in Time magazine by Joe Klein, the doyen of American political writers, and discussed on the main cable news networks, CNN, Fox and MSNBC.

If neither Mr Obama nor Mrs Clinton has the 2,025 delegates needed to win the nomination, and if both appear unable to beat Mr McCain, under one scenario a group of about 100 party elders - the "super-delegates" - could sit out the first ballot in Denver, preventing either candidate winning outright, and then offer Mr Gore the nomination for the good of the party.

So, the two candidates would cheerfully surrender to a man who has not lifted a finger during the entire campaign for either of them or for the Democratic party itself. Did Gore withhold his endorsement hoping for the nomination? Quite possibly. If I were a backer of either of the two candidates, I would be furious if a bunch of party insiders threw my choice under the bus for such a cold, calculating and selfish man. Gore has enough baggage - and enough history of America-bashing remarks in the years since he lost the 2000 election to make his candidacy very iffy at best - especially with only a couple of months to do it in. 

I can't see either Obama or Clinton agreeing to be the second banana on the ticket, either. So a Gore candidacy would likely be seen as even more of a smoke-filled room deal. I think the Democrats have actually found a scenario that makes it even worse for them than it already is, bless them.

UPDATE: Others: The Corner, The Moderate Voice, PoliGazette, Gateway Pundit,