Syrian Nuclear Video

Untitled document

This is a strange story. Remember the sneak attack by Israel on a site in Syria last year? Well, it seems that the Israelis showed Washington a video of North Koreans inside the facility – which just happens to be almost identical to the North Korean reactor facility at Yongbyon, right down to the number of holes for fuel rods.

The officials said the video of the remote site, code-named Al Kibar by the Syrians, shows North Koreans inside. It played a pivotal role in Israel's decision to bomb the facility late at night last Sept. 6, a move that was publicly denounced by Damascus but not by Washington.

Sources familiar with the video say it also shows that the Syrian reactor core's design is the same as that of the North Korean reactor at Yongbyon, including a virtually identical configuration and number of holes for fuel rods. It shows "remarkable resemblances inside and out to Yongbyon," a U.S. intelligence official said. A nuclear weapons specialist called the video "very, very damning."…..

…..David Albright, president of Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) and a former U.N. weapons inspector, said the absence of such evidence warrants skepticism that the reactor was part of an active weapons program.

"The United States and Israel have not identified any Syrian plutonium separation facilities or nuclear weaponization facilities," he said. "The lack of any such facilities gives little confidence that the reactor is part of an active nuclear weapons program. The apparent lack of fuel, either imported or indigenously produced, also is curious and lowers confidence that Syria has a nuclear weapons program."

Now that is one weird statement. The absence of fuel in the presence of what certainly appears to be a reactor should not lead one to conclude that there is no weapons program. Rather, it should lead one to believe that the Syrians hadn't fueled the reactor yet. Albright's statement is akin to claiming that a man carrying a machine gun isn't armed if he doesn't have bullets in it. (One doubts such a defense would work in a court.) Wikipedia had a picture of the top of the reactor at Yongbyon. Perhaps Mr. Albright could explain what in the world the Syrians could have been planning to use such a facility for if not for plutonium production.

Side note: This paints Nancy Pelosi's visit to Syria in an even worse light. And kind of points to the silliness of Barack Obama's grasp of how to deal with thugs.

This entry was posted in North Korea, World news. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Syrian Nuclear Video

  1. daveinboca says:

    Syria and other terrorist countries are systematically and deliberately empowered by NGO striped-pants cookie pushers like David Albright [any relation to the dumbest SecState we’ve ever had?]I was actually disempowered to comment on the most egregious Syria-lovin’ blog-site on this very issue a few months ago, after I depants and spanked with FACTS several inaccurate & misleading pieces the site is question was posting vis-a-vis Syria.There are all sorts of apologists for terror and it’s all based on the prevailing Hate America vibe that the loo-zer countries in the UN that can’t run their economies use as a distraction.David Albright is a not-very-bright example of the above. 

  2. Pingback: Richards World » Blog Archive » Syria goes Nuclear

  3. EliMelak says:

    I’m sorry but I am very skeptical about this whole business with the Syrians. The location of this so called nuclear plant was in plain site with no effort made to camouflage it — two sides of the plant appear to have been painted black which makes it easily visible from the air — satellites and aircraft. Another issue is that Syria is a very poor country with absolute lack of qualified scientist and financing to undertake such a massive project. Also, the aerial pictures do not show any military installations near the plant to protect it from enemy attack. No one would be foolish enough to construct a nuclear site in the middle of the desert and leave it undefended. I need concrete proof to believe this story. Until then I’ll consider it to be a total fabrication.

Comments are closed.