<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring Out Your Dead &#8211; Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martian</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-78400</link>
		<dc:creator>martian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/#comment-78400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but &quot;opt-out&quot; anything is flat-out wrong. For instance having to specifically tell your bank not to share your personal information with outside companies is a travesty. Your personal data should remain &lt;strong&gt;private &lt;/strong&gt;by default, unless you specifically give your permission to share it. Of course banks and other financial institutions (credit card companies, insurance companies, etc.) hate that idea because how many people would actuall&lt;em&gt; give&lt;/em&gt; their permission to share their personal information? They&#039;d never be able to make any substantial cash on the side selling info if they had to ask your permission. By the same logic, your organs should remain &lt;strong&gt;yours&lt;/strong&gt; unless you specifically give permission for their removal. Any other approach puts one in danger of exactly what happened with the Frenchman mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but &quot;opt-out&quot; anything is flat-out wrong. For instance having to specifically tell your bank not to share your personal information with outside companies is a travesty. Your personal data should remain <strong>private </strong>by default, unless you specifically give your permission to share it. Of course banks and other financial institutions (credit card companies, insurance companies, etc.) hate that idea because how many people would actuall<em> give</em> their permission to share their personal information? They&#8217;d never be able to make any substantial cash on the side selling info if they had to ask your permission. By the same logic, your organs should remain <strong>yours</strong> unless you specifically give permission for their removal. Any other approach puts one in danger of exactly what happened with the Frenchman mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Larson</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-78397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/#comment-78397</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Larry Niven&#039;s work to me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Larry Niven&#8217;s work to me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-78381</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2008/06/10/bring-out-your-dead-part-two/#comment-78381</guid>
		<description>My response to those who argue that opt out laws are not an inconvience, is to posit that they all be scheduled for execution an a yearly basis unless they go down to the court house and fill out the &quot;opt out&quot; forms. It simply isn&#039;t the job of government to do these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response to those who argue that opt out laws are not an inconvience, is to posit that they all be scheduled for execution an a yearly basis unless they go down to the court house and fill out the &quot;opt out&quot; forms. It simply isn&#8217;t the job of government to do these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

