Vast Sucking Sound
The problem with a “New” New Deal is that it has to contend with the implosion of the Old New Deal. So says Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. in the Opinion Journal.
His friends advise Barack Obama to launch a “New” New Deal. Maybe that’s because the old New Deal is sinking fast.
Mr. Obama’s one deeply false note during the campaign was his harping on “deregulation” as if that were the source of current troubles. His real problem is the crack-up of the world FDR built.
Fannie Mae was a New Deal creation, subsidizing the securitization of mortgage debt. FDR’s successors piled on the subsidies for housing debt and incentives directed at low-income borrowers. Kaboom.
Then there’s the UAW, born in 1935. For decades the UAW steadily traded away domestic auto market-share to imports and transplants to keep its aging membership toiling away toward their golden pensions and collecting wages and benefits twice those of their competitors. It worked for a while . . .
This one is a must read. Especially the punchline. Especially that.
We are witnessing Washington scrambling to dole out money to the financial sector. Yet I noticed a couple of weeks ago that Ditech had begun advertising again on television. Change?
We are witnessing CEOs of the big three automakers go begging on Capitol Hill to save their companies. They do so by flying in – individually – on very, very, very expensive corporate jets. Change?
We are witnessing a candidate who promised change cheerfully rolling out a “new” cabinet and appointed power structure that reads like a rap sheet of the last Democratic administration. You can’t see the new faces because they’re blocked by the old ones. Change?
We are witnessing calls for the re-enactment of the exact, same policies that brought us to where we are today.
Change?
Via Memeorandum.





