<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Great Man &#8211; With Flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2009/01/11/a-great-man-with-flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2009/01/11/a-great-man-with-flaws/</link>
	<description>Summum nec metuas diem, nec optes - Marcus Valerius Martialis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jackson</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2009/01/11/a-great-man-with-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-80367</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/?p=11619#comment-80367</guid>
		<description>Hitchens demonstrates his ignorance of American history.  Lincoln was no backwoods hick but the highest paid corporate lawyer in Illinois.  His support for the Constituion is a joke having imprisoned over 50,000 people without trial; waged war on civilians, Americans at that (which in WWII would have made him a war criminal), allowed West Virginia to break off from Virginia-uphold the Constitution?  His was an lawyer&#039;s understanding of the Constitution, it meant whatever he wanted it too.

Yes Lincoln was never denied the term president, it prefaced the other titles most used &quot;ape,&quot; tyrant, ogre and the like by his fellow northerners.  For a man who never received a majority of the vote his actions were worse than hideous.

Perhaps Mr. Hitchens can enlighten us all where in the Constituion it reads that it was binding forever?  Or gave Lincoln the power to war on states leaving the Union.  Perhaps Mr. Hitchens could explain why as a precondition to the ratification of the Constitution all states agreed to the stipulation of three states that they be allowed to depart the union at any time for any reason.

Of course Islam isn&#039;t a threat compared to Lincoln.  He compiled a butcher&#039;s bill that equalled all American wars until Gulf War I combined.

Quite an accomplishment.  Quite a villian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens demonstrates his ignorance of American history.  Lincoln was no backwoods hick but the highest paid corporate lawyer in Illinois.  His support for the Constituion is a joke having imprisoned over 50,000 people without trial; waged war on civilians, Americans at that (which in WWII would have made him a war criminal), allowed West Virginia to break off from Virginia-uphold the Constitution?  His was an lawyer&#8217;s understanding of the Constitution, it meant whatever he wanted it too.</p>
<p>Yes Lincoln was never denied the term president, it prefaced the other titles most used &#8220;ape,&#8221; tyrant, ogre and the like by his fellow northerners.  For a man who never received a majority of the vote his actions were worse than hideous.</p>
<p>Perhaps Mr. Hitchens can enlighten us all where in the Constituion it reads that it was binding forever?  Or gave Lincoln the power to war on states leaving the Union.  Perhaps Mr. Hitchens could explain why as a precondition to the ratification of the Constitution all states agreed to the stipulation of three states that they be allowed to depart the union at any time for any reason.</p>
<p>Of course Islam isn&#8217;t a threat compared to Lincoln.  He compiled a butcher&#8217;s bill that equalled all American wars until Gulf War I combined.</p>
<p>Quite an accomplishment.  Quite a villian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martian</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2009/01/11/a-great-man-with-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-80342</link>
		<dc:creator>martian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/?p=11619#comment-80342</guid>
		<description>&quot;his recreation of Lincoln’s journey to Washington by train &quot;

Is he going to re-create the assassins that were waiting along the route, too? Is he going to pose as an invalid going through Maryland to fool assassination plotters? Maybe he can get a female Pinkerton agent to accompany him as a bodyguard. How far is he going to go to try and make himself into the black Lincoln?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;his recreation of Lincoln’s journey to Washington by train &#8221;</p>
<p>Is he going to re-create the assassins that were waiting along the route, too? Is he going to pose as an invalid going through Maryland to fool assassination plotters? Maybe he can get a female Pinkerton agent to accompany him as a bodyguard. How far is he going to go to try and make himself into the black Lincoln?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://bluecrabboulevard.com/2009/01/11/a-great-man-with-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-80341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecrabboulevard.com/?p=11619#comment-80341</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hateful and menacing as it is, Islamic terrorism does not immediately threaten us with secession and disunion and the reduction of millions of Americans to involuntary servitude.&lt;/i&gt;

No, Islamic terrorism merely threatens us with violent death. If Hitchens is worried about unjustified Presidential powers and its effect on civil liberties, what about FDR&#039;s interment of American citizens on the grounds that they were Japanese? Many high school history books either gloss over this fact (blaming &quot;bureaucracy&quot; or J. Edgar Hoover, or whatever), or ignore it completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hateful and menacing as it is, Islamic terrorism does not immediately threaten us with secession and disunion and the reduction of millions of Americans to involuntary servitude.</i></p>
<p>No, Islamic terrorism merely threatens us with violent death. If Hitchens is worried about unjustified Presidential powers and its effect on civil liberties, what about FDR&#8217;s interment of American citizens on the grounds that they were Japanese? Many high school history books either gloss over this fact (blaming &#8220;bureaucracy&#8221; or J. Edgar Hoover, or whatever), or ignore it completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.315 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2011-11-14 20:46:42 -->

