“Data? We Don’t Need No Stinking Data!”

Turns out the high priests of the Temple of Anthropogenic Global Warming have lost the original sacred texts which justify their existence, or so they claim.

What you need to read:

The Dog Ate Global Warming

What is fun to read as well:

QandO: Global Warming “Science” v. The Scientific Method
Ace of Spades: As Peter Venkman said, “Back off man, I’m a scientist.”
Yours truly: “Science Is What We Say It Is, Dammit!”

This entry was posted in Bad Ideas, Junk Science. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to “Data? We Don’t Need No Stinking Data!”

  1. Tom says:

    IBD had this article which basically states that the head computer modeler “acknowledged that the Earth has been cooling and is likely to continue that trend for the next couple of decades.” Another loss to their continuing quest for their unholy grail.

  2. martian says:

    Unfortunately, this will not change the minds of AGW disciples around the world. It has taken on the trappings of a religion where you just accept things on FAITH. That way you don’t need any real data or evidence. I even have arguments with my wife over this. While she is skeptical about the anthropogenic part of global warming she is thoroughly convinced that the global warming is actually occuring. Why? Because it says so in Discover magazine and National Geographic where they have quotes from real NASA scientists that say it’s true. If you see it in popular scientific magazines, it MUST be true.

Comments are closed.