Comments on: Global Heating

By: Bleepless

Bleepless — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:28:41 +0000

Be tolerant, now. The dear boy clearly had a right to call his opponent an asshole. After all, the opponent kept being logical and factual when the dear boy was shouting at him. If you won’t shut up when a pinko orders you to do so, at the top of his lungs, you tsk-tsk deserve anything that happens to you.

By: Some Sunday Rule 5 linktacular links « The Daley Gator

Some Sunday Rule 5 linktacular links « The Daley Gator — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:45:09 +0000

[...] BCB: Why are “scientists” so profane? [...]

By: Mwalimu Daudi

Mwalimu Daudi — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:18:25 +0000

The Washington Post has an interesting solution to the discovery that CRU global warming research is a fraud: Blame the "deniers". Key quote:

Climate scientists should not let themselves be goaded by the irresponsibility of the deniers into overstating the certainties of complex science or, worse, censoring discussion of them.

This is the Age of Obama in a nutshell: Blame the innocent for "goading" the guilty. By the Washington Post's own logic, the Holocaust was caused by the Jews "goading" Hitler by the, ah, Jewishness. Likewise the US "goaded" otherwise peaceful Muslims into becoming terrorists. Women who are raped "goaded" their attackers, and likewise blacks "goaded" the KKK. Such attitudes make sense - at least, they are sensible to the anti-science attitudes of the Washington Post's editorial board. Kill the messenger (the "deniers"), and that makes the message untrue. Science is whatever the consensus says it it And since the Washington Post and the rest of the state-run media get to pick and choose what the "consensus" is, the unwashed heathen deniers will never seriously threaten the beliefs of the global warming cultists. Those who threaten the consensus that 2+2=5 by saying that it is actually 4 can be successfully marginalized. Just don't get caught next time. So says the Washington Post.

By: syn

syn — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:38:48 +0000

If not for Hollywood plus NBC-GE-Go Green brigade then this junk science soap might not have been easily sold around the globe.

How many suckers are still buying a Hollywood or watching NBC or buying GE?

If you keep watching the NBC football games, the 30-rocks, the George Clooneys and Tom Hanks then stop complaining about the fraud you are financially supporting.

FO so long as Hollywood-NBC-Go Green is alive and killing they continue to kill u with their agit-propaganda.

Is a football game or a Tom Hanks movie worth the price of death?

By: Maggie

Maggie — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:47:16 +0000

A 1000 pardons. The last video I offered re-driects incorrectly. Here is the one that it should be:

http://tinyurl.com/yer767u

By: Maggie

Maggie — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:44:27 +0000

Here’s the video:

http://tinyurl.com/y8reqh5

Yes, they are the wounded disgusting animals striking out now with slobbery jaws and nothing but barking:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8oyqj

Unglued, just like the time Gilligan used that pancake syrup to glue the S.S. Minnow back together:

http://tinyurl.com/yaq4bua

Anybody seen Al Gore?

By: dorf

dorf — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:50:16 +0000

SPEAK… It resembles the times when I say to my dog Speak so that she will bark for a Pooch Cookie. Yeah O go ahead and SPEAK….

By: Mwalimu Daudi

Mwalimu Daudi — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:42:42 +0000

STFU – that pretty much sums up the proof used to defend global warming and other “settled” science.